Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2672 GP | H242 GP | H130 GP | Prev 3193 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.50 | 18.71 | 17.62 | 17.21 | 17.00 |
| PP TOI | 1.80 | 1.82 | 1.71 | 1.98 | 1.79 |
| G | 24 | 26 | 18 | 37 | 21 |
| A | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 21 |
| PTS | 50 | 52 | 45 | 63 | 42 |
| PPP | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
| SOG | 174 | 179 | 176 | 183 | 168 |
| PIM | 34 | 48 | 50 | 45 | 25 |
| Hits | 96 | 107 | 111 | 102 | 78 |
| Blocks | 61 | 57 | 66 | 44 | 55 |
Sample: 72 GP · 962 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% finished the year 85% below where it started (19.48 in the first half, 2.85 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Blks/60 finished the year 73% above where it started (1.63 in the first half, 2.82 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 67% above his 3-year rate last season (0.62 against 0.37).
We’re projecting penalty minutes 29% below last season, 48 to 34.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.50 | 18.71 | 17.00 | +10% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.44 | 13.37 | 13.38 | -0% |
| PP TOI | 1.80 | 1.82 | 1.79 | +1% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.61 | 6.61 | 6.32 | +5% |
| G/60 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.67 | +11% |
| iSH% | 11.09 | 11.35 | 10.67 | +6% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.92 | 0.81 | +14% |
| iCF/60 | – | 13.47 | 11.69 | +15% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.92 | 7.81 | +1% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.24 | 3.79 | +12% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.96 | 10.62 | 7.32 | +45% |
| IPP | 65.59 | 66.06 | 62.93 | +5% |
| 1A/60 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.37 | +67% |
| 2A/60 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.37 | +18% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.80 | 1.82 | 1.79 | +1% |
| PP iSH% | 13.59 | 18.51 | 12.20 | +52% |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.85 | 12.37 | 14.20 | -13% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.34 | 2.55 | -8% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.68 | 2.00 | 1.25 | +60% |
| Hits/60 | 4.77 | 5.24 | 4.07 | +29% |
| Blks/60 | 2.50 | 2.37 | 2.53 | -6% |