Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2681 GP | H242 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3150 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.20 | 19.96 | 18.23 | 18.82 | 21.30 |
| PP TOI | 3.55 | 3.60 | 3.37 | 3.84 | 3.08 |
| G | 27 | 24 | 28 | 20 | 29 |
| A | ▲70 | 57 | 49 | 65 | 73 |
| PTS | ▲97 | 81 | 77 | 85 | 102 |
| PPP | 33 | 24 | 25 | 23 | 33 |
| SOG | 171 | 167 | 170 | 163 | 181 |
| PIM | 19 | 24 | 24 | 25 | 18 |
| Hits | 30 | 24 | 20 | 28 | 59 |
| Blocks | 42 | 47 | 40 | 53 | 50 |
Sample: 81 GP · 1,106 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Baseline (88) already near the range; small nudge. Buy-low on the lingering 'Vegas villain' narrative.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting power play points 38% above last season, 24 to 33.
Goals ran at a 28 pace in the second half after 20 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits/60 ran 55% below his 3-year rate last season (1.25 against 2.77).
Blks/60 finished the year 39% below where it started (2.36 in the first half, 1.44 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.20 | 19.96 | 21.30 | -6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.76 | 13.66 | 14.59 | -6% |
| PP TOI | 3.55 | 3.60 | 3.08 | +17% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.02 | 6.02 | 5.92 | +2% |
| G/60 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.85 | +16% |
| iSH% | 15.53 | 16.28 | 14.31 | +14% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.64 | 0.61 | +6% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.96 | 14.34 | -10% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.16 | 7.49 | -4% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.04 | 2.41 | +26% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 11.11 | 11.12 | 11.09 | +0% |
| IPP | 81.44 | 81.85 | 80.45 | +2% |
| 1A/60 | 1.09 | 1.14 | 1.04 | +10% |
| 2A/60 | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.71 | -24% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.55 | 3.60 | 3.08 | +17% |
| PP iSH% | 19.67 | 11.92 | 21.86 | -45% |
| PP SOG/60 | 8.57 | 8.64 | 8.30 | +4% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.86 | 1.31 | -34% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.61 | +25% |
| Hits/60 | 1.53 | 1.25 | 2.77 | -55% |
| Blks/60 | 1.67 | 1.90 | 1.78 | +7% |