Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2664 GP | H225 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3225 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.18 | 19.02 | 18.16 | 17.79 | 20.13 |
| PP TOI | 2.59 | 2.57 | 2.51 | 2.61 | 2.90 |
| G | 25 | 32 | 44 | 24 | 24 |
| A | 57 | 50 | 60 | 44 | 61 |
| PTS | 82 | 82 | 103 | 68 | 85 |
| PPP | 20 | 18 | 20 | 17 | 25 |
| SOG | 144 | 131 | 146 | 121 | 153 |
| PIM | 33 | 31 | 46 | 21 | 33 |
| Hits | 15 | 13 | 11 | 14 | 16 |
| Blocks | 50 | 51 | 57 | 48 | 45 |
Sample: 64 GP · 899 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
ixG/60 finished the year 150% above where it started (0.40 in the first half, 1.16 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% finished the year 117% above where it started (13.37 in the first half, 28.97 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 sits in the 97th percentile league-wide (1.00).
Hits/60 sits in the 2th percentile league-wide (0.53).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.18 | 19.02 | 20.13 | -6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 14.23 | 14.05 | 14.44 | -3% |
| PP TOI | 2.59 | 2.57 | 2.90 | -11% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.32 | 4.87 | 5.00 | -3% |
| G/60 | 0.99 | 1.07 | 0.65 | +66% |
| iSH% | 18.53 | 21.97 | 12.92 | +70% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.63 | 0.59 | +8% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.34 | 9.44 | -1% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.47 | 6.39 | +1% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.00 | 2.73 | +10% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 11.83 | 13.07 | 10.78 | +21% |
| IPP | 74.54 | 76.11 | 72.24 | +5% |
| 1A/60 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.02 | -2% |
| 2A/60 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.70 | -5% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.59 | 2.57 | 2.90 | -11% |
| PP iSH% | 16.43 | 14.93 | 16.86 | -11% |
| PP SOG/60 | 6.43 | 7.30 | 8.73 | -16% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.84 | 1.05 | -20% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.90 | 1.60 | 1.40 | +14% |
| Hits/60 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.76 | -30% |
| Blks/60 | 1.97 | 1.93 | 1.85 | +4% |