🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Ryan Hartman

MIN · Age 31.9 · 🇺🇸 USA · 6′0″, 197 lb · Draft 2013, 30th overall (CHI)
MINteam
C,RWposition
42position rank
131skater rank
54overall
-8offense
62peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2676 GPH237 GPH139 GPPrev 3202 GP · 3y
TOI16.5816.7416.9715.6515.92
PP TOI1.591.781.691.871.51
G2125311919
A2322311325
PTS4446623244
PPP997119
SOG190180204158195
PIM7652693692
Hits7369588085
Blocks751031099761

Sample: 76 GP · 1,098 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
A
2322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Assists ran at a 31 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half surge
PTS
4422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Points ran at a 62 pace in the second half after 32 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate
Blks/60
4.9722-2323-2424-2525-26

Blks/60 ran 68% above his 3-year rate last season (4.97 against 2.96).

Above his 3-year rate
PP TOI
1.5922-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

PP TOI ran 18% above his 3-year rate last season (1.78 against 1.51).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Ryan Hartman is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · John Hynes (MIN)
Last year: John Hynes full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI16.5816.7415.92+5%
5v5 TOI14.4014.4513.16+10%
PP TOI1.591.781.51+18%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 21 · 16
TOI*
3-yr 15.9215.80Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 13.1614.60Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 1.511.15Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
16.5822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
14.4022-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
1.5922-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/607.567.388.42-12%
G/600.760.820.70+17%
iSH%10.0511.118.31+34%
ixG/600.970.85+15%
iCF/6016.0616.81-4%
iSCF/608.858.26+7%
iHDCF/603.773.52+7%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 21 · 16
SOG/60
3-yr 8.429.50Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 8.3118.95Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.851.51Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 16.8120.81Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 8.2612.07Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 3.526.68Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
7.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
11.1122-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.9722-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
16.0622-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
8.8522-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
3.7722-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
2122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
19022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindProcess rising: 5v5 ixG/60 0.97 (93rd pct league-wide) up on the 3-yr 0.85 — the shot quality is real, so the projected goal rate leans on chances, not a hot %.
RiskShot volume down 12% (5v5 SOG/60 7.38 vs 8.42) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.
TailwindTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 climbed 0.71→1.25 across the year — process trending the right way into next season.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%8.137.968.36-5%
IPP69.7571.9166.72+8%
1A/600.560.550.61-10%
2A/600.310.330.36-9%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 21 · 16
1A/60
3-yr 0.611.03Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.360.77Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.5522-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
2322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
4422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 8.0%, IPP 71.9%).

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI1.591.781.51+18%
PP iSH%15.9021.4711.87+81%
PP SOG/6013.2012.3914.99-17%
PP ixG/602.492.41+3%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 21 · 16
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 1.511.15Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 14.9919.64Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 2.415.24Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
1.7822-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
12.3922-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
2.4922-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskPP role projected down: 1.8→1.6 PP TOI/gp (role tapered late (Q4 1.1 vs 1.8 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish) — the biggest PPP lever.
RiskPP finishing ran hot (21.5% vs 11.9% 3-yr) with flat PP chances (PP ixG/60 2.49) — expect PP goals to cool.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/603.392.514.58-45%
Hits/603.583.394.49-24%
Blks/603.934.972.96+68%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 21 · 16
PIMs/60
3-yr 4.584.37Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 4.492.83Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.961.80Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
2.5122-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
3.3922-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
4.9722-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
7622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
7322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
7522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskHits tailing off: Q4 2.83/60 and 2nd-half 2.69 below the 3.39 season rate — projected DOWN to 3.58/60, weighting the recent decline over the 4.49 3-yr mark.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.80/60 and 2nd-half 4.54 below the 4.97 season rate — projected DOWN to 3.93/60, weighting the recent decline over the 2.96 3-yr mark.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.11/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.