Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2667 GP | H241 GP | H126 GP | Prev 3152 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.18 | 16.08 | 15.21 | 16.01 | 19.78 |
| PP TOI | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.41 | 1.45 | 2.75 |
| G | 18 | 16 | 15 | 17 | 30 |
| A | 28 | 31 | 26 | 37 | 24 |
| PTS | 46 | 46 | 41 | 54 | 53 |
| PPP | 3 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 12 |
| SOG | 164 | 162 | 144 | 189 | 237 |
| PIM | 43 | 54 | 53 | 55 | 45 |
| Hits | 153 | 180 | 179 | 181 | 157 |
| Blocks | 78 | 81 | 80 | 83 | 85 |
Sample: 67 GP · 889 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
1A/60 ran 150% above his 3-year rate last season (1.01 against 0.40).
PP TOI finished the year 72% below where it started (1.45 in the first half, 0.40 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% finished the year 46% above where it started (7.68 in the first half, 11.25 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
ixG/60 sits in the 97th percentile league-wide (1.06).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.18 | 16.08 | 19.78 | -19% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.30 | 13.27 | 14.75 | -10% |
| PP TOI | 0.75 | 0.81 | 2.75 | -70% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.35 | 7.69 | 8.17 | -6% |
| G/60 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.94 | -21% |
| iSH% | 10.33 | 9.62 | 11.48 | -16% |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.06 | 0.95 | +11% |
| iCF/60 | – | 15.79 | 15.31 | +3% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.97 | 8.73 | +3% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.72 | 4.47 | +6% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.55 | 9.61 | 9.30 | +3% |
| IPP | 72.16 | 77.98 | 58.32 | +34% |
| 1A/60 | 0.82 | 1.01 | 0.40 | +152% |
| 2A/60 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.32 | +24% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.75 | 0.81 | 2.75 | -70% |
| PP iSH% | 15.15 | 12.46 | 15.90 | -22% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.12 | 8.83 | 12.64 | -30% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.33 | 2.81 | -17% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.09 | 2.43 | 1.90 | +28% |
| Hits/60 | 8.20 | 9.51 | 7.31 | +30% |
| Blks/60 | 3.72 | 3.71 | 3.75 | -1% |