🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Boone Jenner

WSH · Age 33.1 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′2″, 203 lb · Draft 2011, 37th overall (CBJ)
WSHteam
C,LWposition
55position rank
162skater rank
41overall
-16offense
57peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2667 GPH241 GPH126 GPPrev 3152 GP · 3y
TOI16.1816.0815.2116.0119.78
PP TOI0.750.810.411.452.75
G1816151730
A2831263724
PTS4646415453
PPP340912
SOG164162144189237
PIM4354535545
Hits153180179181157
Blocks7881808385

Sample: 67 GP · 889 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Above his 3-year rate
1A/60
1.0122-2323-2424-2525-26

1A/60 ran 150% above his 3-year rate last season (1.01 against 0.40).

Second-half fade
PP TOI
3-yr 2.750.15Q1Q2Q3Q4

PP TOI finished the year 72% below where it started (1.45 in the first half, 0.40 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half surge
iSH%
3-yr 11.4811.83Q1Q2Q3Q4

iSH% finished the year 46% above where it started (7.68 in the first half, 11.25 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Top of the league
ixG/60
1.0622-2323-2424-2525-26

ixG/60 sits in the 97th percentile league-wide (1.06).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Blake ColemanLW,RW · Minnesota Wild92% match
    shared: Blocks, Hits, PIM, SOG
  • Shane PintoC · Ottawa Senators87% match
    shared: Blocks, Hits
  • Frank VatranoLW · Anaheim Ducks85% match
    shared: Blocks, Hits, PIM, SOG
  • Ryan HartmanC,RW · Minnesota Wild85% match
    shared: Blocks, PIM
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Boone Jenner is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Spencer Carbery (WSH)
Last year (CBJ, traded): Dean Evason Q1-Q2 → Rick Bowness Q3-Q4 · hired Jan — in-season change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI16.1816.0819.78-19%
5v5 TOI13.3013.2714.75-10%
PP TOI0.750.812.75-70%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 10 · 21 · 20
TOI*
3-yr 19.7814.99Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 14.7513.39Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 2.750.15Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
16.1822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
13.3022-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.7522-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/607.357.698.17-6%
G/600.760.740.94-21%
iSH%10.339.6211.48-16%
ixG/601.060.95+11%
iCF/6015.7915.31+3%
iSCF/608.978.73+3%
iHDCF/604.724.47+6%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 10 · 21 · 20
SOG/60
3-yr 8.177.61Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 11.4811.83Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.951.21Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 15.3115.68Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 8.739.18Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 4.473.81Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
7.6922-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
9.6222-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
1.0622-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
15.7922-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
8.9722-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
4.7222-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
1822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
16422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindGoals projected UP: iSH% cratered to 9.6% vs 11.5% 3-yr while 5v5 ixG/60 1.06 (97th pct league-wide) held/rose — the chances say the finishing rebounds toward 10.3%, lifting the goal rate ~3%.
RiskAge 33 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%9.559.619.30+3%
IPP72.1677.9858.32+34%
1A/600.821.010.40+152%
2A/600.420.400.32+24%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 10 · 21 · 20
1A/60
3-yr 0.400.90Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.320.45Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
1.0122-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.4022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
2822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
4622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskIPP spiked to 78.0% vs 58.3% 3-yr — point participation this far above baseline rarely holds; assist share likely gives a little back.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.750.812.75-70%
PP iSH%15.1512.4615.90-22%
PP SOG/6011.128.8312.64-30%
PP ixG/602.332.81-17%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 10 · 21 · 20
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 2.750.15Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 12.6419.57Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 2.811.88Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.8122-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
8.8322-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
2.3322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~0.7 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/602.092.431.90+28%
Hits/608.209.517.31+30%
Blks/603.723.713.75-1%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 10 · 21 · 20
PIMs/60
3-yr 1.902.69Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 7.318.96Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 3.753.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
2.4322-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
9.5122-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.7122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
4322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
15322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
7822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 9.51/60 (83rd pct league-wide) → 8.20 projected.
ContextBlocks role-stable at 3.71/60 (75th pct league-wide) → 3.72 projected.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.13/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.