🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Mark Kastelic

BOS · Age 27.4 · 🇺🇸 USA · 6′3″, 233 lb · Draft 2019, 125th overall (OTT)
BOSteam
C,RWposition
57position rank
174skater rank
39overall
-50offense
88peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2682 GPH240 GPH142 GPPrev 3189 GP · 3y
TOI12.1812.6211.9012.889.10
PP TOI0.080.080.060.100.18
G91210147
A10106148
PTS1922162715
PPP01020
SOG941018911387
PIM141140123156118
Hits217215211219216
Blocks5364547444

Sample: 82 GP · 840 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half fade
A
1022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Assists ran at a 6 pace in the second half after 14 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade
PTS
1922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Points ran at a 16 pace in the second half after 27 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate
TOI
12.1822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

TOI ran 39% above his 3-year rate last season (12.62 against 9.10).

We project it down
G
922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting goals 25% below last season, 12 to 9.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Adam KlapkaRW · Calgary Flames96% match
    shared: PIM, Hits, Blocks
  • Marcus FolignoLW · Minnesota Wild96% match
    shared: PIM, Hits, Blocks
  • Tanner JeannotLW,RW · Boston Bruins96% match
    shared: PIM, Hits, Blocks
  • Mathieu OlivierRW · Columbus Blue Jackets94% match
    shared: PIM, Hits, Blocks
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Mark Kastelic is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 4
    fills: SOG, PPP, A, G
  • Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 4
    fills: SOG, A, PPP, G
  • Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 4
    fills: A, PPP, SOG, G
  • William NylanderRW · Toronto Maple Leafscovers 4
    fills: PPP, SOG, G, A
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Marco Sturm (BOS)
Last year: Marco Sturm full season (1st yr) — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI12.1812.629.10+39%
5v5 TOI9.6610.258.60+19%
PP TOI0.080.080.18-53%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 20 · 21 · 19
TOI*
3-yr 9.1011.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 8.609.27Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.180.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
12.1822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
9.6622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/605.995.997.24-17%
G/600.640.710.63+13%
iSH%10.6411.858.67+37%
ixG/600.980.78+25%
iCF/6013.8411.75+18%
iSCF/607.497.20+4%
iHDCF/604.644.02+15%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 20 · 21 · 19
SOG/60
3-yr 7.246.81Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 8.6714.98Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.781.24Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 11.7516.35Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 7.209.54Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 4.025.79Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
5.9922-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
11.8522-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.9822-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
13.8422-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
7.4922-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
4.6422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
9422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindProcess rising: 5v5 ixG/60 0.98 (93rd pct league-wide) up on the 3-yr 0.78 — the shot quality is real, so the projected goal rate leans on chances, not a hot %.
RiskShot volume down 17% (5v5 SOG/60 5.99 vs 7.24) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%8.498.717.63+14%
IPP60.1658.4566.60-12%
1A/600.420.430.34+28%
2A/600.200.070.30-76%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 20 · 21 · 19
1A/60
3-yr 0.340.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.300.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.4322-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.0722-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 8.7%, IPP 58.5%).
TailwindShot-driving up (5v5 iCF/60 13.84 vs 11.75) — real creation underneath, so don't over-regress the helpers.
TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 4.64 vs 4.02) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.080.080.18-53%
PP iSH%n/a0.00
PP SOG/601.090.005.43-100%
PP ixG/600.001.13-100%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 20 · 21 · 19
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.180.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 5.430.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 1.130.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0822-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~0.1 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/609.859.7010.01-3%
Hits/6016.3615.2018.10-16%
Blks/603.253.783.54+7%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 20 · 21 · 19
PIMs/60
3-yr 10.019.54Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 18.1013.63Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 3.541.70Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
9.7022-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
15.2022-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.7822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
14122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
21722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
5322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindElite hits volume (94th pct) and role-stable — a bankable hits floor (16.36/60 projected).
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.70/60 and 2nd-half 3.08 below the 3.78 season rate — projected DOWN to 3.25/60, weighting the recent decline over the 3.54 3-yr mark.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.71/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.