Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H240 GP | H142 GP | Prev 3189 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.18 | 12.62 | 11.90 | 12.88 | 9.10 |
| PP TOI | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.18 |
| G | 9 | 12 | 10 | 14 | 7 |
| A | 10 | 10 | 6 | 14 | 8 |
| PTS | 19 | 22 | 16 | 27 | 15 |
| PPP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| SOG | 94 | 101 | 89 | 113 | 87 |
| PIM | 141 | 140 | 123 | 156 | 118 |
| Hits | 217 | 215 | 211 | 219 | 216 |
| Blocks | 53 | 64 | 54 | 74 | 44 |
Sample: 82 GP · 840 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 6 pace in the second half after 14 in the first, per 82 games.
Points ran at a 16 pace in the second half after 27 in the first, per 82 games.
TOI ran 39% above his 3-year rate last season (12.62 against 9.10).
We’re projecting goals 25% below last season, 12 to 9.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.18 | 12.62 | 9.10 | +39% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.66 | 10.25 | 8.60 | +19% |
| PP TOI | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.18 | -53% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.99 | 5.99 | 7.24 | -17% |
| G/60 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.63 | +13% |
| iSH% | 10.64 | 11.85 | 8.67 | +37% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.98 | 0.78 | +25% |
| iCF/60 | – | 13.84 | 11.75 | +18% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.49 | 7.20 | +4% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.64 | 4.02 | +15% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.49 | 8.71 | 7.63 | +14% |
| IPP | 60.16 | 58.45 | 66.60 | -12% |
| 1A/60 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.34 | +28% |
| 2A/60 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.30 | -76% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.18 | -53% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 5.43 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 1.13 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 9.85 | 9.70 | 10.01 | -3% |
| Hits/60 | 16.36 | 15.20 | 18.10 | -16% |
| Blks/60 | 3.25 | 3.78 | 3.54 | +7% |