Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2661 GP | H238 GP | H123 GP | Prev 3202 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.20 | 21.32 | 20.32 | 19.49 | 20.56 |
| PP TOI | 3.07 | 2.95 | 2.94 | 2.95 | 3.37 |
| G | 38 | 36 | 35 | 39 | 39 |
| A | 62 | 67 | 71 | 62 | 59 |
| PTS | 100 | 104 | 106 | 101 | 99 |
| PPP | 33 | 31 | 35 | 25 | 36 |
| SOG | 329 | 306 | 315 | 293 | 341 |
| PIM | 18 | 13 | 22 | 0 | 15 |
| Hits | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Blocks | 42 | 43 | 49 | 34 | 34 |
Sample: 61 GP · 1,015 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 35 pace in the second half after 25 in the first, per 82 games.
Blocks ran at a 49 pace in the second half after 34 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 ran 27% below his 3-year rate last season (0.59 against 0.81).
SOG/60 sits in the 98th percentile league-wide (9.27).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.20 | 21.32 | 20.56 | +4% |
| 5v5 TOI | 16.79 | 16.65 | 15.49 | +7% |
| PP TOI | 3.07 | 2.95 | 3.37 | -13% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 9.27 | 9.27 | 10.64 | -13% |
| G/60 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.09 | -3% |
| iSH% | 10.77 | 11.43 | 10.29 | +11% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.95 | 1.02 | -7% |
| iCF/60 | – | 17.96 | 19.25 | -7% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 11.22 | 10.37 | +8% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.90 | 3.54 | +10% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.66 | 8.24 | 9.28 | -11% |
| IPP | 78.68 | 81.50 | 74.54 | +9% |
| 1A/60 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.81 | -27% |
| 2A/60 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.44 | -7% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.07 | 2.95 | 3.37 | -13% |
| PP iSH% | 12.11 | 9.12 | 12.95 | -30% |
| PP SOG/60 | 15.01 | 14.69 | 16.30 | -10% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.69 | 1.87 | -10% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.54 | -12% |
| Hits/60 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.38 | -69% |
| Blks/60 | 1.81 | 1.65 | 1.56 | +6% |