Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2681 GP | H241 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3225 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.15 | 19.24 | 18.44 | 17.83 | 18.50 |
| PP TOI | 3.42 | 3.51 | 3.54 | 3.47 | 3.01 |
| G | 44 | 41 | 41 | 40 | 44 |
| A | 40 | 42 | 48 | 35 | 37 |
| PTS | 84 | 82 | 89 | 75 | 81 |
| PPP | 25 | 24 | 30 | 18 | 24 |
| SOG | 281 | 273 | 255 | 292 | 285 |
| PIM | 38 | 36 | 32 | 39 | 43 |
| Hits | 84 | 86 | 83 | 89 | 74 |
| Blocks | 38 | 49 | 53 | 44 | 31 |
Sample: 81 GP · 1,179 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 30 pace in the second half after 18 in the first, per 82 games.
Assists ran at a 48 pace in the second half after 35 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI sits in the 96th percentile league-wide (3.51).
We’re projecting blocks 22% below last season, 49 to 38.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.15 | 19.24 | 18.50 | +4% |
| 5v5 TOI | 14.71 | 14.57 | 13.80 | +6% |
| PP TOI | 3.42 | 3.51 | 3.01 | +17% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 9.17 | 9.31 | 10.19 | -9% |
| G/60 | 1.45 | 1.58 | 1.43 | +10% |
| iSH% | 15.87 | 16.97 | 14.08 | +21% |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.01 | 0.94 | +8% |
| iCF/60 | – | 18.51 | 19.77 | -6% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.95 | 10.11 | -11% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.61 | 4.04 | -11% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.84 | 11.09 | 10.54 | +5% |
| IPP | 76.01 | 78.00 | 73.58 | +6% |
| 1A/60 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.73 | -17% |
| 2A/60 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.37 | -59% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.42 | 3.51 | 3.01 | +17% |
| PP iSH% | 14.42 | 9.10 | 18.27 | -50% |
| PP SOG/60 | 14.65 | 13.95 | 17.46 | -20% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.00 | 1.68 | +19% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.41 | 1.47 | 1.78 | -17% |
| Hits/60 | 3.92 | 4.07 | 3.69 | +10% |
| Blks/60 | 1.85 | 2.09 | 1.49 | +40% |