Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H241 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3235 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 17.90 | 18.18 | 16.69 | 16.95 | 17.91 |
| PP TOI | 2.70 | 2.71 | 2.54 | 2.88 | 3.13 |
| G | 29 | 31 | 34 | 28 | 36 |
| A | 39 | 40 | 39 | 41 | 40 |
| PTS | 68 | 71 | 73 | 69 | 76 |
| PPP | 21 | 21 | 32 | 10 | 28 |
| SOG | 198 | 192 | 167 | 217 | 264 |
| PIM | 30 | 28 | 18 | 38 | 38 |
| Hits | 90 | 74 | 73 | 75 | 118 |
| Blocks | 31 | 24 | 30 | 18 | 40 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,154 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 32 pace in the second half after 10 in the first, per 82 games.
Penalty minutes ran at a 18 pace in the second half after 38 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits/60 ran 43% below his 3-year rate last season (3.43 against 5.99).
1A/60 ran 26% below his 3-year rate last season (0.52 against 0.71).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 17.90 | 18.18 | 17.91 | +1% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.89 | 14.08 | 13.76 | +2% |
| PP TOI | 2.70 | 2.71 | 3.13 | -13% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.63 | 6.29 | 8.31 | -24% |
| G/60 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.94 | -17% |
| iSH% | 11.80 | 12.40 | 11.37 | +9% |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.00 | 1.08 | -7% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.58 | 14.99 | -16% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 9.41 | 10.31 | -9% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.94 | 5.64 | -12% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.97 | 10.40 | 9.46 | +10% |
| IPP | 72.12 | 72.24 | 71.98 | +0% |
| 1A/60 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.71 | -26% |
| 2A/60 | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.44 | +65% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.70 | 2.71 | 3.13 | -13% |
| PP iSH% | 17.05 | 22.24 | 15.59 | +43% |
| PP SOG/60 | 16.18 | 14.57 | 20.39 | -29% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 3.00 | 3.97 | -24% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.33 | 1.25 | 1.74 | -28% |
| Hits/60 | 4.23 | 3.43 | 5.99 | -43% |
| Blks/60 | 1.46 | 1.14 | 1.93 | -41% |