🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Mathew Barzal

NYI · Age 29.2 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′1″, 190 lb · Draft 2015, 16th overall (NYI)
NYIteam
C,RWposition
34position rank
100skater rank
66overall
37offense
29peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2681 GPH240 GPH141 GPPrev 3168 GP · 3y
TOI20.5320.6518.3119.2019.68
PP TOI3.443.473.113.823.18
G1919191921
A5254604753
PTS7173806674
PPP2320231823
SOG204186188185223
PIM3362428129
Hits3229253450
Blocks5451485353

Sample: 81 GP · 1,234 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Context brain — deployment, role, coaching & injury signals (why the line should move)
ContextKeep top Islanders secure; discount depth-scoring upside. · Coaching landscape report

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
We project it down
PIM
3322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting penalty minutes 47% below last season, 62 to 33.

Below his 3-year rate
1A/60
0.6822-2323-2424-2525-26

1A/60 ran 39% below his 3-year rate last season (0.68 against 1.12).

Below his 3-year rate
Hits/60
1.3122-2323-2424-2525-26

Hits/60 ran 41% below his 3-year rate last season (1.31 against 2.22).

Second-half surge
A
5222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Assists ran at a 60 pace in the second half after 47 in the first, per 82 games.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Mats ZuccarelloRW · Los Angeles Kings85% match
    shared: A, PPP, Blocks
  • William EklundLW,RW · Ottawa Senators83% match
    shared: A, Blocks
  • Evgeni MalkinC,LW · Pittsburgh Penguins82% match
    shared: A, PPP, PIM, SOG
  • Dylan StromeC · Washington Capitals82% match
    shared: A, Blocks, PPP
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Mathew Barzal is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Peter DeBoer (NYI)
Last year: Patrick Roy Q1-Q4 → Peter DeBoer final 4 games · Q4 — in-season change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI20.5320.6519.68+5%
5v5 TOI15.0715.2415.29-0%
PP TOI3.443.473.18+9%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 22 · 18
TOI*
3-yr 19.6818.25Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 15.2914.66Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 3.183.53Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
20.5322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
15.0722-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
3.4422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/605.835.837.45-22%
G/600.520.580.61-4%
iSH%8.909.958.13+22%
ixG/600.610.69-12%
iCF/6012.3013.71-10%
iSCF/606.087.14-15%
iHDCF/602.823.06-8%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 22 · 18
SOG/60
3-yr 7.456.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 8.133.62Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.690.56Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 13.7114.77Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 7.146.59Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 3.062.05Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
5.8322-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
9.9522-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.6122-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
12.3022-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
6.0822-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
2.8222-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
1922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
20422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 9.9% vs a 8.1% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.61 (48th pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 8.9% pulls the goal rate ~11% down.
RiskShot volume down 22% (5v5 SOG/60 5.83 vs 7.45) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%8.859.218.42+9%
IPP63.3159.5767.89-12%
1A/600.850.681.12-39%
2A/600.300.390.26+51%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 22 · 18
1A/60
3-yr 1.120.45Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.260.68Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.6822-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3922-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
5222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
7122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 9.2%, IPP 59.6%).

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI3.443.473.18+9%
PP iSH%9.795.9210.89-46%
PP SOG/607.877.2610.33-30%
PP ixG/601.061.10-3%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 22 · 18
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 3.183.53Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 10.337.56Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 1.101.59Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
3.4722-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
7.2622-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
1.0622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
2322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
1822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextBoost Schaefer usage baseline; small ceiling trim for Horvat/Barzal. · Apples & Ginos Fantasy Hockey
ContextPP role steady at ~3.4 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/600.951.360.93+46%
Hits/601.471.312.22-41%
Blks/602.202.192.29-4%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 21 · 22 · 18
PIMs/60
3-yr 0.930.45Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 2.220.91Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.291.82Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.3622-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
1.3122-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
2.1922-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
3322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
3222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
5422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskHits tailing off: Q4 0.91/60 and 2nd-half 1.07 below the 1.31 season rate — projected DOWN to 1.47/60, weighting the recent decline over the 2.22 3-yr mark.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.82/60 and 2nd-half 2.05 below the 2.19 season rate — projected DOWN to 2.20/60, weighting the recent decline over the 2.29 3-yr mark.