Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2681 GP | H240 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3168 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.53 | 20.65 | 18.31 | 19.20 | 19.68 |
| PP TOI | 3.44 | 3.47 | 3.11 | 3.82 | 3.18 |
| G | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 21 |
| A | 52 | 54 | 60 | 47 | 53 |
| PTS | 71 | 73 | 80 | 66 | 74 |
| PPP | 23 | 20 | 23 | 18 | 23 |
| SOG | 204 | 186 | 188 | 185 | 223 |
| PIM | 33 | 62 | 42 | 81 | 29 |
| Hits | 32 | 29 | 25 | 34 | 50 |
| Blocks | 54 | 51 | 48 | 53 | 53 |
Sample: 81 GP · 1,234 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting penalty minutes 47% below last season, 62 to 33.
1A/60 ran 39% below his 3-year rate last season (0.68 against 1.12).
Hits/60 ran 41% below his 3-year rate last season (1.31 against 2.22).
Assists ran at a 60 pace in the second half after 47 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.53 | 20.65 | 19.68 | +5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 15.07 | 15.24 | 15.29 | -0% |
| PP TOI | 3.44 | 3.47 | 3.18 | +9% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.83 | 5.83 | 7.45 | -22% |
| G/60 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.61 | -4% |
| iSH% | 8.90 | 9.95 | 8.13 | +22% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.61 | 0.69 | -12% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.30 | 13.71 | -10% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.08 | 7.14 | -15% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.82 | 3.06 | -8% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.85 | 9.21 | 8.42 | +9% |
| IPP | 63.31 | 59.57 | 67.89 | -12% |
| 1A/60 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 1.12 | -39% |
| 2A/60 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.26 | +51% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.44 | 3.47 | 3.18 | +9% |
| PP iSH% | 9.79 | 5.92 | 10.89 | -46% |
| PP SOG/60 | 7.87 | 7.26 | 10.33 | -30% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.06 | 1.10 | -3% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.95 | 1.36 | 0.93 | +46% |
| Hits/60 | 1.47 | 1.31 | 2.22 | -41% |
| Blks/60 | 2.20 | 2.19 | 2.29 | -4% |