🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Jason Robertson

DAL · Age 27.0 · 🇺🇸 USA · 6′3″, 200 lb · Draft 2017, 39th overall (DAL)
DALteam
LWposition
4position rank
11skater rank
142overall
97offense
45peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2682 GPH241 GPH141 GPPrev 3246 GP · 3y
TOI20.0120.2519.3418.4618.32
PP TOI3.963.894.043.743.06
G4145414937
A5951564653
PTS10096979590
PPP3941424029
SOG272295272318252
PIM2932442020
Hits5548484864
Blocks3834383031

Sample: 82 GP · 1,228 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingLeft wing · league-wide (of 281)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Context brain — deployment, role, coaching & injury signals (why the line should move)
TailwindHold a top-tier forward baseline; strong multi-year value. · Analytics research compilation

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
PIM
2922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Penalty minutes ran at a 44 pace in the second half after 20 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate
ixG/60
1.0822-2323-2424-2525-26

ixG/60 ran 43% above his 3-year rate last season (1.08 against 0.75).

Above his 3-year rate
PP TOI
3.9622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

PP TOI ran 27% above his 3-year rate last season (3.89 against 3.06).

Second-half surge
BLK
3822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Blocks ran at a 38 pace in the second half after 30 in the first, per 82 games.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Jason Robertson is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Glen Gulutzan (DAL)
Last year: Glen Gulutzan full season (1st yr) — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI20.0120.2518.32+11%
5v5 TOI15.0414.9814.24+5%
PP TOI3.963.893.06+27%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 22 · 19
TOI*
3-yr 18.3219.73Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 14.2415.28Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 3.064.42Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
20.0122-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
15.0422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
3.9622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/609.719.878.33+19%
G/601.241.221.13+8%
iSH%12.8112.3613.55-9%
ixG/601.080.75+43%
iCF/6018.1716.14+13%
iSCF/6010.708.05+33%
iHDCF/604.103.20+28%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 22 · 19
SOG/60
3-yr 8.3310.54Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 13.5513.76Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.751.15Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 16.1419.43Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 8.0511.37Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 3.204.96Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
9.8722-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
12.3622-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
1.0822-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
18.1722-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
10.7022-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
4.1022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
4122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
27222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindProcess rising: 5v5 ixG/60 1.08 (97th pct league-wide) up on the 3-yr 0.75 — the shot quality is real, so the projected goal rate leans on chances, not a hot %.
TailwindShot volume up 19% (5v5 SOG/60 9.87 vs 8.33) — volume is the repeatable half, so this raises the goal ceiling.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%10.8210.8610.71+1%
IPP73.1171.8876.30-6%
1A/600.680.590.84-30%
2A/600.610.440.64-31%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 22 · 19
1A/60
3-yr 0.840.41Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.640.21Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.5922-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.4422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
5922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
10022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 10.9%, IPP 71.9%).
TailwindShot-driving up (5v5 iCF/60 18.17 vs 16.14) — real creation underneath, so don't over-regress the helpers.
TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 4.10 vs 3.20) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI3.963.893.06+27%
PP iSH%15.8021.1214.30+48%
PP SOG/6013.8813.3517.27-23%
PP ixG/602.132.25-5%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 22 · 19
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 3.064.42Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 17.2711.42Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 2.251.42Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
3.8922-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
13.3522-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
2.1322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
3922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
1222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
2722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~4.0 PP TOI/gp.
RiskPP finishing ran hot (21.1% vs 14.3% 3-yr) with flat PP chances (PP ixG/60 2.13) — expect PP goals to cool.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/601.541.270.82+54%
Hits/602.442.153.06-30%
Blks/601.331.271.39-9%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 22 · 19
PIMs/60
3-yr 0.822.07Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 3.061.65Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 1.391.45Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.2722-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
2.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
1.2722-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
2922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
5522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
3822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskHits tailing off: Q4 1.65/60 and 2nd-half 2.08 below the 2.15 season rate — projected DOWN to 2.44/60, weighting the recent decline over the 3.06 3-yr mark.
TailwindBlocks surging late: Q4 1.45/60 and 2nd-half 1.44 vs a 1.27 season rate (1.39 3-yr) (9th pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 1.33/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.