Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H241 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3246 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.01 | 20.25 | 19.34 | 18.46 | 18.32 |
| PP TOI | 3.96 | 3.89 | 4.04 | 3.74 | 3.06 |
| G | 41 | 45 | 41 | 49 | 37 |
| A | 59 | 51 | 56 | 46 | 53 |
| PTS | 100 | 96 | 97 | 95 | 90 |
| PPP | 39 | 41 | 42 | 40 | 29 |
| SOG | 272 | 295 | 272 | 318 | 252 |
| PIM | 29 | 32 | 44 | 20 | 20 |
| Hits | 55 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 64 |
| Blocks | 38 | 34 | 38 | 30 | 31 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,228 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Penalty minutes ran at a 44 pace in the second half after 20 in the first, per 82 games.
ixG/60 ran 43% above his 3-year rate last season (1.08 against 0.75).
PP TOI ran 27% above his 3-year rate last season (3.89 against 3.06).
Blocks ran at a 38 pace in the second half after 30 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.01 | 20.25 | 18.32 | +11% |
| 5v5 TOI | 15.04 | 14.98 | 14.24 | +5% |
| PP TOI | 3.96 | 3.89 | 3.06 | +27% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 9.71 | 9.87 | 8.33 | +19% |
| G/60 | 1.24 | 1.22 | 1.13 | +8% |
| iSH% | 12.81 | 12.36 | 13.55 | -9% |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.08 | 0.75 | +43% |
| iCF/60 | – | 18.17 | 16.14 | +13% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 10.70 | 8.05 | +33% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.10 | 3.20 | +28% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.82 | 10.86 | 10.71 | +1% |
| IPP | 73.11 | 71.88 | 76.30 | -6% |
| 1A/60 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.84 | -30% |
| 2A/60 | 0.61 | 0.44 | 0.64 | -31% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.96 | 3.89 | 3.06 | +27% |
| PP iSH% | 15.80 | 21.12 | 14.30 | +48% |
| PP SOG/60 | 13.88 | 13.35 | 17.27 | -23% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.13 | 2.25 | -5% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.54 | 1.27 | 0.82 | +54% |
| Hits/60 | 2.44 | 2.15 | 3.06 | -30% |
| Blks/60 | 1.33 | 1.27 | 1.39 | -9% |