Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2681 GP | H240 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3225 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.21 | 20.25 | 18.67 | 19.46 | 20.04 |
| PP TOI | 4.02 | 4.08 | 3.84 | 4.32 | 3.63 |
| G | 39 | 38 | 44 | 33 | 39 |
| A | 47 | 51 | 49 | 52 | 45 |
| PTS | 86 | 89 | 93 | 85 | 84 |
| PPP | 28 | 30 | 31 | 30 | 27 |
| SOG | 231 | 222 | 236 | 207 | 255 |
| PIM | 61 | 62 | 78 | 46 | 34 |
| Hits | 46 | 40 | 43 | 36 | 58 |
| Blocks | 44 | 42 | 40 | 43 | 44 |
Sample: 81 GP · 1,104 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Penalty minutes ran at a 78 pace in the second half after 46 in the first, per 82 games.
Goals ran at a 44 pace in the second half after 33 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI sits in the 99th percentile league-wide (4.08).
PP SOG/60 ran 25% below his 3-year rate last season (10.52 against 14.10).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.21 | 20.25 | 20.04 | +1% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.99 | 13.64 | 15.21 | -10% |
| PP TOI | 4.02 | 4.08 | 3.63 | +12% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.15 | 7.06 | 7.89 | -11% |
| G/60 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 0.95 | +21% |
| iSH% | 14.57 | 16.15 | 11.99 | +35% |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.01 | 0.98 | +3% |
| iCF/60 | – | 13.58 | 14.41 | -6% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 9.94 | 9.89 | +1% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 5.16 | 5.03 | +3% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 11.41 | 12.82 | 9.72 | +32% |
| IPP | 66.96 | 69.11 | 62.83 | +10% |
| 1A/60 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.76 | +22% |
| 2A/60 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.40 | +21% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 4.02 | 4.08 | 3.63 | +12% |
| PP iSH% | 16.44 | 13.78 | 17.18 | -20% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.41 | 10.52 | 14.10 | -25% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.31 | 2.82 | -18% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.75 | 1.41 | 1.37 | +3% |
| Hits/60 | 2.32 | 2.01 | 2.58 | -22% |
| Blks/60 | 1.75 | 1.68 | 1.86 | -10% |