🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Nathan MacKinnon

COL · Age 30.9 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′0″, 200 lb · Draft 2013, 1st overall (COL)
COLteam
Cposition
2position rank
2skater rank
210overall
126offense
84peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2680 GPH240 GPH140 GPPrev 3232 GP · 3y
TOI22.3122.2620.9820.5622.65
PP TOI4.254.304.014.584.15
G4554426744
A8476737985
PTS129130115146130
PPP3931253742
SOG369361336385386
PIM4240532640
Hits6166686451
Blocks4936274556

Sample: 80 GP · 1,313 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
PIM
4222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Penalty minutes ran at a 53 pace in the second half after 26 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade
Blks/60
3-yr 2.170.57Q1Q2Q3Q4

Blks/60 finished the year 54% below where it started (1.72 in the first half, 0.78 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Top of the league
PP TOI
4.2522-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

PP TOI sits in the 99th percentile league-wide (4.30).

Top of the league
SOG/60
10.0522-2323-2424-2525-26

SOG/60 sits in the 99th percentile league-wide (10.05).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Macklin CelebriniC · San Jose Sharks92% match
    shared: SOG, A, PPP, G
  • Jake GuentzelLW,RW · Tampa Bay Lightning89% match
    shared: G, PPP, SOG, A
  • Matt BoldyLW,RW · Minnesota Wild89% match
    shared: SOG, G, PPP, A
  • Sidney CrosbyC · Pittsburgh Penguins85% match
    shared: A, G, PPP, SOG
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Nathan MacKinnon is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Jared Bednar (COL)
Last year: Jared Bednar full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI22.3122.2622.65-2%
5v5 TOI16.6916.4216.92-3%
PP TOI4.254.304.15+3%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 21 · 19
TOI*
3-yr 22.6520.64Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 16.9216.62Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 4.153.97Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
22.3122-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
16.6922-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
4.2522-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/6010.0510.0510.87-8%
G/601.291.421.16+22%
iSH%12.8314.1310.70+32%
ixG/600.920.88+5%
iCF/6017.5918.96-7%
iSCF/609.8710.32-4%
iHDCF/603.653.68-1%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 21 · 19
SOG/60
3-yr 10.879.12Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 10.7010.42Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.880.84Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 18.9616.53Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 10.328.93Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 3.683.61Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
10.0522-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
14.1322-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.9222-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
17.5922-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
9.8722-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
3.6522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
4522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
36922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindProcess rising: 5v5 ixG/60 0.92 (88th pct league-wide) up on the 3-yr 0.88 — the shot quality is real, so the projected goal rate leans on chances, not a hot %.
ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 1.04 (1st half) to 0.82 (2nd).

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%11.3112.2910.45+18%
IPP76.5875.0578.86-5%
1A/601.231.321.19+11%
2A/600.680.690.66+5%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 21 · 19
1A/60
3-yr 1.190.95Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.660.57Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
1.3222-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.6922-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
8422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
12922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskOn-ice SH% hot at 12.3% vs a 10.4% 3-yr mark — teammate finishing regresses (~8% is league-normal), so some assists come off.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI4.254.304.15+3%
PP iSH%10.9311.2310.72+5%
PP SOG/6017.3217.1018.00-5%
PP ixG/602.081.94+7%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 21 · 19
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 4.153.97Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 18.0010.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 1.942.49Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
4.3022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
17.1022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
2.0822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
3922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
1222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
2722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPositive PPP regression for MacKinnon/Necas on a system fix. · Apples & Ginos Fantasy Hockey
ContextPP role steady at ~4.3 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/600.780.731.36-46%
Hits/602.312.512.00+25%
Blks/601.251.232.17-43%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 21 · 19
PIMs/60
3-yr 1.360.38Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 2.003.04Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.170.57Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
0.7322-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
2.5122-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
1.2322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
4222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
6122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
4922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 2.51/60 (30th pct league-wide) → 2.31 projected.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 0.57/60 and 2nd-half 0.78 below the 1.23 season rate — projected DOWN to 1.25/60, weighting the recent decline over the 2.17 3-yr mark.