Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2661 GP | H234 GP | H127 GP | Prev 3202 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.99 | 14.23 | 14.06 | 13.58 | 12.69 |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.11 |
| G | 15 | 20 | 23 | 16 | 11 |
| A | 14 | 15 | 10 | 21 | 13 |
| PTS | 29 | 35 | 33 | 37 | 24 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 115 | 126 | 143 | 106 | 97 |
| PIM | 130 | 136 | 118 | 157 | 118 |
| Hits | 280 | 281 | 281 | 281 | 262 |
| Blocks | 72 | 56 | 51 | 63 | 68 |
Sample: 61 GP · 793 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 10 pace in the second half after 21 in the first, per 82 games.
iHDCF/60 finished the year 94% above where it started (3.20 in the first half, 6.22 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
ixG/60 ran 37% above his 3-year rate last season (0.95 against 0.69).
We’re projecting blocks 29% above last season, 56 to 72.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.99 | 14.23 | 12.69 | +12% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.69 | 13.00 | 11.66 | +12% |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.11 | -74% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.09 | 6.81 | 5.84 | +17% |
| G/60 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.64 | +42% |
| iSH% | 12.46 | 13.36 | 10.98 | +22% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.95 | 0.69 | +37% |
| iCF/60 | – | 13.54 | 10.47 | +29% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.55 | 5.99 | +43% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.92 | 3.85 | +28% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.35 | 10.08 | 8.14 | +24% |
| IPP | 56.40 | 53.90 | 64.49 | -16% |
| 1A/60 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.38 | -0% |
| 2A/60 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.33 | -10% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.11 | -74% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 2.72 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.41 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 7.21 | 7.49 | 7.39 | +1% |
| Hits/60 | 15.86 | 15.58 | 16.28 | -4% |
| Blks/60 | 2.93 | 2.35 | 3.80 | -38% |