Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2679 GP | H239 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3176 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.78 | 14.03 | 13.73 | 13.65 | 12.78 |
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| G | 9 | 8 | 13 | 4 | 9 |
| A | 9 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 10 |
| PTS | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 19 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 107 | 113 | 114 | 112 | 99 |
| PIM | 99 | 96 | 78 | 115 | 105 |
| Hits | 194 | 213 | 202 | 224 | 170 |
| Blocks | 72 | 80 | 83 | 77 | 61 |
Sample: 79 GP · 891 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 5 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 finished the year 59% below where it started (0.40 in the first half, 0.16 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 31% below his 3-year rate last season (5.83 against 8.49).
We’re projecting goals 12% above last season, 8 to 9.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.78 | 14.03 | 12.78 | +10% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.04 | 11.29 | 10.74 | +5% |
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.06 | +63% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.86 | 6.86 | 6.38 | +8% |
| G/60 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.54 | -26% |
| iSH% | 6.84 | 5.83 | 8.49 | -31% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.93 | 0.81 | +15% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.78 | 12.28 | +4% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.66 | 7.43 | -10% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.71 | 3.97 | +19% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 5.98 | 5.47 | 7.12 | -23% |
| IPP | 63.70 | 69.63 | 57.47 | +21% |
| 1A/60 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.31 | -14% |
| 2A/60 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.22 | +22% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.06 | +63% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.92 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.19 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 6.06 | 5.99 | 6.60 | -9% |
| Hits/60 | 12.44 | 13.32 | 11.36 | +17% |
| Blks/60 | 3.80 | 4.04 | 3.49 | +16% |