Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2669 GP | H237 GP | H132 GP | Prev 3237 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.06 | 17.88 | 17.04 | 16.38 | 18.78 |
| PP TOI | 2.74 | 2.76 | 2.63 | 2.91 | 2.91 |
| G | 18 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 |
| A | 31 | 37 | 30 | 44 | 35 |
| PTS | 49 | 57 | 51 | 65 | 54 |
| PPP | 16 | 24 | 13 | 36 | 16 |
| SOG | 148 | 135 | 132 | 139 | 177 |
| PIM | 27 | 45 | 32 | 60 | 18 |
| Hits | 55 | 49 | 29 | 71 | 103 |
| Blocks | 70 | 70 | 67 | 74 | 65 |
Sample: 69 GP · 897 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% finished the year 150% above where it started (4.52 in the first half, 14.16 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
ixG/60 finished the year 134% above where it started (0.40 in the first half, 0.93 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.06 | 17.88 | 18.78 | -5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.09 | 13.01 | 12.66 | +3% |
| PP TOI | 2.74 | 2.76 | 2.91 | -5% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.01 | 5.01 | 6.28 | -20% |
| G/60 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.54 | -1% |
| iSH% | 9.81 | 10.58 | 8.56 | +24% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.69 | 0.69 | -0% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.63 | 12.16 | -4% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.68 | 6.52 | +2% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.34 | 3.10 | +8% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.97 | 10.80 | 9.31 | +16% |
| IPP | 55.80 | 52.43 | 60.55 | -13% |
| 1A/60 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.58 | -31% |
| 2A/60 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.54 | -12% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.74 | 2.76 | 2.91 | -5% |
| PP iSH% | 17.05 | 21.90 | 13.54 | +62% |
| PP SOG/60 | 10.16 | 10.09 | 11.57 | -13% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.53 | 2.36 | +7% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.03 | 1.47 | 0.66 | +123% |
| Hits/60 | 2.44 | 2.21 | 4.84 | -54% |
| Blks/60 | 2.99 | 3.07 | 2.98 | +3% |