Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2657 GP | H241 GP | H116 GP | Prev 3233 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.38 | 16.51 | 15.78 | 14.52 | 17.37 |
| PP TOI | 2.58 | 2.34 | 2.72 | 1.27 | 2.50 |
| G | 24 | 23 | 26 | 13 | 27 |
| A | 43 | 42 | 49 | 18 | 44 |
| PTS | 67 | 65 | 75 | 31 | 71 |
| PPP | 21 | 20 | 26 | 0 | 20 |
| SOG | 144 | 128 | 137 | 118 | 173 |
| PIM | 14 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 22 |
| Hits | 38 | 42 | 48 | 21 | 30 |
| Blocks | 32 | 33 | 29 | 37 | 33 |
Sample: 57 GP · 742 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 49 pace in the second half after 18 in the first, per 82 games.
Points ran at a 75 pace in the second half after 31 in the first, per 82 games.
PP ixG/60 ran 97% above his 3-year rate last season (3.09 against 1.57).
SOG/60 ran 33% below his 3-year rate last season (4.28 against 6.36).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.38 | 16.51 | 17.37 | -5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.84 | 13.03 | 13.65 | -5% |
| PP TOI | 2.58 | 2.34 | 2.50 | -7% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.15 | 4.28 | 6.36 | -33% |
| G/60 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.85 | -33% |
| iSH% | 13.33 | 13.32 | 13.34 | -0% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.53 | 0.73 | -27% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.29 | 12.43 | -25% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.41 | 7.47 | -28% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.91 | 3.15 | -8% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 11.30 | 12.55 | 10.35 | +21% |
| IPP | 61.22 | 54.42 | 73.25 | -26% |
| 1A/60 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.77 | +5% |
| 2A/60 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 0.64 | -75% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.58 | 2.34 | 2.50 | -7% |
| PP iSH% | 17.51 | 16.65 | 18.13 | -8% |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.83 | 13.51 | 10.80 | +25% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 3.09 | 1.57 | +97% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.98 | -34% |
| Hits/60 | 2.34 | 2.34 | 1.47 | +59% |
| Blks/60 | 1.68 | 1.70 | 1.66 | +2% |