Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2680 GP | H239 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3238 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.78 | 18.80 | 17.38 | 17.60 | 17.99 |
| PP TOI | 3.20 | 3.25 | 3.10 | 3.39 | 2.92 |
| G | 27 | 26 | 27 | 24 | 26 |
| A | 48 | 52 | 40 | 64 | 42 |
| PTS | 75 | 78 | 67 | 88 | 68 |
| PPP | 26 | 28 | 19 | 36 | 25 |
| SOG | 181 | 177 | 171 | 183 | 168 |
| PIM | 29 | 23 | 23 | 22 | 25 |
| Hits | 49 | 44 | 47 | 41 | 53 |
| Blocks | 29 | 30 | 27 | 32 | 27 |
Sample: 80 GP · 1,122 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 19 pace in the second half after 36 in the first, per 82 games.
Assists ran at a 40 pace in the second half after 64 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting penalty minutes 26% above last season, 23 to 29.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.78 | 18.80 | 17.99 | +4% |
| 5v5 TOI | 14.22 | 14.03 | 13.54 | +4% |
| PP TOI | 3.20 | 3.25 | 2.92 | +11% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.20 | 6.20 | 6.29 | -1% |
| G/60 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.80 | +8% |
| iSH% | 13.19 | 13.87 | 12.69 | +9% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.62 | 0.68 | -8% |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.01 | 12.19 | +15% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.83 | 7.22 | -19% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.30 | 3.32 | -31% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.97 | 10.27 | 9.17 | +12% |
| IPP | 74.40 | 75.57 | 71.21 | +6% |
| 1A/60 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.61 | +30% |
| 2A/60 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.37 | -14% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.20 | 3.25 | 2.92 | +11% |
| PP iSH% | 16.09 | 14.62 | 17.15 | -15% |
| PP SOG/60 | 10.78 | 11.08 | 9.58 | +16% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.42 | 1.34 | +6% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.86 | 0.64 | 1.08 | -41% |
| Hits/60 | 2.34 | 2.14 | 2.64 | -19% |
| Blks/60 | 1.18 | 1.28 | 1.27 | +1% |