Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2681 GP | H241 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3232 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.82 | 16.84 | 15.91 | 15.58 | 16.67 |
| PP TOI | 2.26 | 2.22 | 2.33 | 2.11 | 2.32 |
| G | 27 | 28 | 30 | 27 | 27 |
| A | 25 | 23 | 21 | 26 | 25 |
| PTS | 52 | 52 | 51 | 52 | 51 |
| PPP | 9 | 7 | 12 | 2 | 10 |
| SOG | 240 | 224 | 247 | 200 | 250 |
| PIM | 22 | 32 | 20 | 45 | 16 |
| Hits | 159 | 168 | 179 | 157 | 137 |
| Blocks | 61 | 51 | 60 | 41 | 62 |
Sample: 81 GP · 1,061 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
1A/60 finished the year 61% below where it started (0.92 in the first half, 0.35 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP ixG/60 ran 73% above his 3-year rate last season (2.47 against 1.43).
Blocks ran at a 60 pace in the second half after 41 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting power play points 29% above last season, 7 to 9.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.82 | 16.84 | 16.67 | +1% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.21 | 13.11 | 13.31 | -2% |
| PP TOI | 2.26 | 2.22 | 2.32 | -5% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 8.87 | 8.87 | 10.36 | -14% |
| G/60 | 0.99 | 1.07 | 1.01 | +5% |
| iSH% | 11.20 | 12.06 | 9.79 | +23% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.89 | 0.85 | +4% |
| iCF/60 | – | 17.41 | 20.21 | -14% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 9.55 | 9.75 | -2% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.13 | 3.67 | +12% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.69 | 10.03 | 9.15 | +10% |
| IPP | 75.15 | 82.28 | 68.71 | +20% |
| 1A/60 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.66 | -6% |
| 2A/60 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.29 | +36% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.26 | 2.22 | 2.32 | -5% |
| PP iSH% | 9.10 | 7.30 | 10.40 | -30% |
| PP SOG/60 | 14.10 | 13.70 | 13.91 | -2% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.47 | 1.43 | +73% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.70 | +29% |
| Hits/60 | 7.91 | 8.53 | 6.98 | +22% |
| Blks/60 | 2.86 | 2.60 | 3.23 | -19% |