Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H240 GP | H142 GP | Prev 3245 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.48 | 15.64 | 14.45 | 14.66 | 16.62 |
| PP TOI | 1.79 | 1.76 | 1.77 | 1.74 | 2.42 |
| G | 20 | 19 | 17 | 21 | 26 |
| A | 22 | 23 | 16 | 29 | 21 |
| PTS | 42 | 42 | 34 | 50 | 47 |
| PPP | 7 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| SOG | 192 | 201 | 195 | 207 | 212 |
| PIM | 49 | 44 | 39 | 49 | 51 |
| Hits | 108 | 91 | 118 | 65 | 141 |
| Blocks | 40 | 37 | 32 | 42 | 48 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,047 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
1A/60 ran 104% above his 3-year rate last season (0.74 against 0.36).
Hits ran at a 118 pace in the second half after 65 in the first, per 82 games.
Assists ran at a 16 pace in the second half after 29 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 42% below his 3-year rate last season (6.40 against 11.12).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.48 | 15.64 | 16.62 | -6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.64 | 12.77 | 13.52 | -6% |
| PP TOI | 1.79 | 1.76 | 2.42 | -27% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.89 | 8.13 | 8.80 | -8% |
| G/60 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.98 | -47% |
| iSH% | 8.19 | 6.40 | 11.12 | -42% |
| ixG/60 | – | 1.49 | 1.25 | +19% |
| iCF/60 | – | 16.44 | 15.02 | +9% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 11.34 | 11.01 | +3% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 7.22 | 6.67 | +8% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.45 | 9.54 | 8.99 | +6% |
| IPP | 59.32 | 59.07 | 60.56 | -2% |
| 1A/60 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.36 | +104% |
| 2A/60 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.47 | -15% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.79 | 1.76 | 2.42 | -27% |
| PP iSH% | 13.77 | 14.68 | 13.12 | +12% |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.84 | 14.17 | 12.35 | +15% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 3.10 | 2.99 | +4% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.30 | 2.00 | 2.25 | -11% |
| Hits/60 | 6.07 | 5.10 | 7.17 | -29% |
| Blks/60 | 2.08 | 1.95 | 2.28 | -15% |