Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2668 GP | H228 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3238 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 22.78 | 22.37 | 21.31 | 21.33 | 24.36 |
| PP TOI | 1.61 | 1.41 | 1.79 | 1.14 | 1.60 |
| G | 8 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| A | 32 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 40 |
| PTS | 40 | 29 | 32 | 27 | 50 |
| PPP | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| SOG | 150 | 139 | 138 | 140 | 160 |
| PIM | 29 | 39 | 43 | 35 | 24 |
| Hits | 43 | 31 | 40 | 26 | 71 |
| Blocks | 93 | 100 | 70 | 121 | 116 |
Sample: 68 GP · 1,189 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI finished the year 47% above where it started (1.14 in the first half, 1.68 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 63% below his 3-year rate last season (2.20 against 5.88).
We’re projecting points 38% above last season, 29 to 40.
We’re projecting hits 39% above last season, 31 to 43.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 22.78 | 22.37 | 24.36 | -8% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.59 | 17.49 | 18.79 | -7% |
| PP TOI | 1.61 | 1.41 | 1.60 | -12% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.40 | 4.54 | 5.26 | -14% |
| G/60 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.31 | -68% |
| iSH% | 4.04 | 2.20 | 5.88 | -63% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.30 | 0.26 | +17% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.44 | 11.49 | -9% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.53 | 3.25 | +9% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 1.16 | 0.63 | +84% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.22 | 10.51 | 9.32 | +13% |
| IPP | 33.09 | 29.61 | 46.26 | -36% |
| 1A/60 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.40 | -1% |
| 2A/60 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.70 | -21% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.61 | 1.41 | 1.60 | -12% |
| PP iSH% | 5.42 | 7.75 | 5.42 | +43% |
| PP SOG/60 | 9.98 | 8.13 | 5.82 | +40% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.36 | 0.53 | -32% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.23 | 1.51 | 0.78 | +94% |
| Hits/60 | 1.48 | 1.11 | 2.36 | -53% |
| Blks/60 | 2.73 | 3.13 | 3.33 | -6% |