Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2671 GP | H242 GP | H129 GP | Prev 3241 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 22.60 | 22.60 | 20.91 | 22.07 | 22.60 |
| PP TOI | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.31 | 1.51 | 1.74 |
| G | 8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| A | 26 | 29 | 25 | 34 | 32 |
| PTS | 34 | 32 | 28 | 38 | 42 |
| PPP | 6 | 8 | 2 | 17 | 11 |
| SOG | 149 | 156 | 122 | 206 | 165 |
| PIM | 20 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 24 |
| Hits | 48 | 42 | 40 | 44 | 62 |
| Blocks | 123 | 134 | 146 | 117 | 116 |
Sample: 71 GP · 1,347 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI finished the year 79% below where it started (1.47 in the first half, 0.31 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 65% below his 3-year rate last season (1.74 against 5.04).
Shots ran at a 122 pace in the second half after 206 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting power play points 25% below last season, 8 to 6.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 22.60 | 22.60 | 22.60 | -0% |
| 5v5 TOI | 18.67 | 18.97 | 18.02 | +5% |
| PP TOI | 0.84 | 0.80 | 1.74 | -54% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.04 | 5.17 | 5.17 | +0% |
| G/60 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.26 | -65% |
| iSH% | 4.05 | 1.74 | 5.04 | -65% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.19 | 0.24 | -20% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.03 | 12.15 | -1% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.72 | 3.30 | -18% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.40 | 0.64 | -37% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.96 | 9.01 | 8.91 | +1% |
| IPP | 35.69 | 34.50 | 37.15 | -7% |
| 1A/60 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.43 | -37% |
| 2A/60 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.38 | +38% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.84 | 0.80 | 1.74 | -54% |
| PP iSH% | 5.60 | 0.00 | 10.00 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 9.07 | 10.59 | 11.42 | -7% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.48 | 0.87 | +70% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.79 | -43% |
| Hits/60 | 1.70 | 1.43 | 2.27 | -37% |
| Blks/60 | 3.87 | 3.92 | 3.79 | +4% |