Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2677 GP | H240 GP | H137 GP | Prev 3166 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.42 | 21.54 | 20.44 | 20.53 | 20.94 |
| PP TOI | 2.21 | 2.08 | 2.35 | 1.79 | 2.84 |
| G | 13 | 13 | 12 | 13 | 18 |
| A | 37 | 28 | 41 | 13 | 46 |
| PTS | 50 | 40 | 53 | 26 | 64 |
| PPP | 18 | 15 | 20 | 9 | 25 |
| SOG | 223 | 216 | 222 | 210 | 258 |
| PIM | 49 | 53 | 47 | 60 | 49 |
| Hits | 83 | 93 | 92 | 93 | 77 |
| Blocks | 95 | 82 | 80 | 84 | 111 |
Sample: 77 GP · 1,305 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 41 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.
Power play points ran at a 20 pace in the second half after 9 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 ran 47% below his 3-year rate last season (0.23 against 0.43).
PP TOI ran 27% below his 3-year rate last season (2.08 against 2.84).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.42 | 21.54 | 20.94 | +3% |
| 5v5 TOI | 16.78 | 16.95 | 16.72 | +1% |
| PP TOI | 2.21 | 2.08 | 2.84 | -27% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.68 | 6.89 | 8.24 | -16% |
| G/60 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.39 | -28% |
| iSH% | 4.53 | 4.06 | 4.74 | -14% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.32 | 0.35 | -8% |
| iCF/60 | – | 16.23 | 17.93 | -9% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.82 | 5.17 | -26% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.60 | 0.82 | -27% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.81 | 6.89 | 9.32 | -26% |
| IPP | 38.64 | 35.75 | 43.36 | -18% |
| 1A/60 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.43 | -47% |
| 2A/60 | 0.49 | 0.23 | 0.59 | -61% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.21 | 2.08 | 2.84 | -27% |
| PP iSH% | 14.67 | 12.15 | 15.47 | -21% |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.27 | 12.35 | 13.99 | -12% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.00 | 1.25 | -20% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.89 | 2.02 | 1.95 | +4% |
| Hits/60 | 3.19 | 3.54 | 3.07 | +15% |
| Blks/60 | 3.45 | 2.99 | 4.13 | -28% |