🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Filip Hronek

VAN · Age 28.7 · 🇨🇿 Czechia · 6′0″, 190 lb · Draft 2016, 53rd overall (DET)
VANteam
Dposition
36position rank
144skater rank
49overall
-2offense
52peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2682 GPH241 GPH141 GPPrev 3206 GP · 3y
TOI24.6525.0124.3022.7523.03
PP TOI1.721.942.161.711.96
G88888
A4041374540
PTS4849455348
PPP1421241814
SOG137137154120141
PIM4733422445
Hits130133129137117
Blocks931008811285

Sample: 82 GP · 1,582 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Major regression candidate; regress toward multi-year norms (~40 pts). Luck reads stay as rate cuts (A/G); the Buium PP threat is bet on the minutes.

Context brain — deployment, role, coaching & injury signals (why the line should move)
RiskRegress points below 50; scoring outran repeatable generation. · Analytics research compilation

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
PIM
4722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Penalty minutes ran at a 42 pace in the second half after 24 in the first, per 82 games.

We project it down
PPP
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27

We’re projecting power play points 33% below last season, 21 to 14.

Below his 3-year rate
iSH%
2.1622-2323-2424-2525-26

iSH% ran 49% below his 3-year rate last season (2.16 against 4.19).

Second-half surge
PP TOI
3-yr 1.962.58Q1Q2Q3Q4

PP TOI finished the year 28% above where it started (1.71 in the first half, 2.19 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Filip Hronek is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Manny Malhotra (VAN) new voice
Last year: Adam Foote full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI24.6525.0123.03+9%
5v5 TOI19.3119.3017.97+7%
PP TOI1.721.941.96-1%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
TOI*
3-yr 23.0325.11Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 17.9720.24Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 1.962.58Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
24.6522-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
19.3122-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
1.7222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/603.763.714.25-13%
G/600.110.080.18-55%
iSH%3.582.164.19-49%
ixG/600.150.18-19%
iCF/608.6810.84-20%
iSCF/601.672.59-36%
iHDCF/600.110.29-62%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
SOG/60
3-yr 4.254.84Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 4.190.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.180.16Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 10.8410.77Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 2.591.87Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 0.290.16Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
3.7122-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
2.1622-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
8.6822-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
1.6722-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.1122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
13722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskRegress Hronek's G/assists/PPP toward his multi-year norms. · Fantasy hockey defenseman analysis
ContextFinishing looks earned: iSH% 2.2% sits near the 4.2% 3-yr mark with 5v5 ixG/60 0.15 (13th pct league-wide) — goals held close to last year.
RiskShot volume down 13% (5v5 SOG/60 3.71 vs 4.25) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%9.238.1111.05-27%
IPP37.9938.4637.41+3%
1A/600.360.340.37-9%
2A/600.490.380.59-35%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
1A/60
3-yr 0.370.16Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.590.16Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.3422-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
4022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
4822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 8.1%, IPP 38.5%).
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI1.721.941.96-1%
PP iSH%10.8815.9810.88+47%
PP SOG/609.209.458.18+16%
PP ixG/600.880.86+2%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 1.962.58Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 8.1812.22Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.860.88Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
1.9422-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
9.4522-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.8822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
1122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskRegress Hronek's G/assists/PPP toward his multi-year norms. · Fantasy hockey defenseman analysis
RiskPP role projected down: 1.9→1.7 PP TOI/gp (prospect Zeev Buium threatens his PP role — a modest PP-minutes haircut rather than a blind PPP cut) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/601.521.181.65-29%
Hits/603.923.983.97+0%
Blks/602.672.922.79+5%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  22 · 19 · 22 · 19
PIMs/60
3-yr 1.652.03Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 3.973.28Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.791.87Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.1822-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
3.9822-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
2.9222-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
4722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
13022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
9322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskRegress points off the lost PP role; keep the hits/blocks floor.
RiskHits tailing off: Q4 3.28/60 and 2nd-half 3.67 below the 3.98 season rate — projected DOWN to 3.92/60, weighting the recent decline over the 3.97 3-yr mark.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.87/60 and 2nd-half 2.40 below the 2.92 season rate — projected DOWN to 2.67/60, weighting the recent decline over the 2.79 3-yr mark.