Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H241 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3206 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 24.65 | 25.01 | 24.30 | 22.75 | 23.03 |
| PP TOI | 1.72 | 1.94 | 2.16 | 1.71 | 1.96 |
| G | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| A | 40 | 41 | 37 | 45 | 40 |
| PTS | 48 | 49 | 45 | 53 | 48 |
| PPP | 14 | 21 | 24 | 18 | 14 |
| SOG | 137 | 137 | 154 | 120 | 141 |
| PIM | 47 | 33 | 42 | 24 | 45 |
| Hits | 130 | 133 | 129 | 137 | 117 |
| Blocks | 93 | 100 | 88 | 112 | 85 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,582 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Major regression candidate; regress toward multi-year norms (~40 pts). Luck reads stay as rate cuts (A/G); the Buium PP threat is bet on the minutes.
Metrics worth highlighting
Penalty minutes ran at a 42 pace in the second half after 24 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting power play points 33% below last season, 21 to 14.
iSH% ran 49% below his 3-year rate last season (2.16 against 4.19).
PP TOI finished the year 28% above where it started (1.71 in the first half, 2.19 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 24.65 | 25.01 | 23.03 | +9% |
| 5v5 TOI | 19.31 | 19.30 | 17.97 | +7% |
| PP TOI | 1.72 | 1.94 | 1.96 | -1% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.76 | 3.71 | 4.25 | -13% |
| G/60 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.18 | -55% |
| iSH% | 3.58 | 2.16 | 4.19 | -49% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.15 | 0.18 | -19% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.68 | 10.84 | -20% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 1.67 | 2.59 | -36% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.11 | 0.29 | -62% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.23 | 8.11 | 11.05 | -27% |
| IPP | 37.99 | 38.46 | 37.41 | +3% |
| 1A/60 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.37 | -9% |
| 2A/60 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.59 | -35% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.72 | 1.94 | 1.96 | -1% |
| PP iSH% | 10.88 | 15.98 | 10.88 | +47% |
| PP SOG/60 | 9.20 | 9.45 | 8.18 | +16% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.88 | 0.86 | +2% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.52 | 1.18 | 1.65 | -29% |
| Hits/60 | 3.92 | 3.98 | 3.97 | +0% |
| Blks/60 | 2.67 | 2.92 | 2.79 | +5% |