🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Radko Gudas

FLA · Age 36.2 · 🇨🇿 Czechia · 6′0″, 208 lb · Draft 2010, 66th overall (T.B)
FLAteam
Dposition
37position rank
149skater rank
48overall
-55offense
102peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2656 GPH228 GPH128 GPPrev 3219 GP · 3y
TOI16.2616.1815.5716.3318.93
PP TOI0.040.040.030.050.08
G33333
A1316102216
PTS1619132519
PPP00000
SOG869281104107
PIM1169817026110
Hits229240205275300
Blocks125129104154164

Sample: 56 GP · 799 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
PIM
11622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Penalty minutes ran at a 170 pace in the second half after 26 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade
A
1322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Assists ran at a 10 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Ben ChiarotD · Detroit Red Wings89% match
    shared: Hits, PIM, Blocks
  • Kaiden GuhleD · Montreal Canadiens89% match
    shared: Hits, PIM, Blocks
  • Connor CliftonD · Boston Bruins88% match
    shared: Hits, PIM, Blocks
  • Connor MurphyD · Edmonton Oilers86% match
    shared: PIM, Blocks, Hits
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Radko Gudas is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
    fills: SOG, A, PPP
  • Quinn HughesD · Minnesota Wildcovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Paul Maurice (FLA)
Last year (ANA, traded): Joel Quenneville full season (1st yr) — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI16.2616.1818.93-15%
5v5 TOI13.5614.2815.71-9%
PP TOI0.040.040.08-57%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  10 · 18 · 22 · 6
TOI*
3-yr 18.9311.82Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 15.7110.19Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.080.03Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
16.2622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
13.5622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/604.314.504.43+2%
G/600.140.150.14+7%
iSH%3.213.333.16+5%
ixG/600.150.17-10%
iCF/6012.3811.75+5%
iSCF/601.952.42-20%
iHDCF/600.450.26+72%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  10 · 18 · 22 · 6
SOG/60
3-yr 4.433.93Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 3.160.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.170.11Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 11.756.87Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 2.420.98Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 0.260.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
4.5022-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
3.3322-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
12.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
1.9522-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.4522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
8622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextFinishing looks earned: iSH% 3.3% sits near the 3.2% 3-yr mark with 5v5 ixG/60 0.15 (13th pct league-wide) — goals held close to last year.
RiskAge 36 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%8.318.268.44-2%
IPP36.7937.5034.62+8%
1A/600.390.380.38-1%
2A/600.310.380.33+14%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  10 · 18 · 22 · 6
1A/60
3-yr 0.380.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.330.98Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 8.3%, IPP 37.5%).
TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 0.45 vs 0.26) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.040.040.08-57%
PP iSH%n/a0.00
PP SOG/601.660.006.64-100%
PP ixG/606.150.20+2950%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  10 · 18 · 22 · 6
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.080.03Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 6.640.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.2017.57Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0422-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
6.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~0.0 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/606.795.034.83+4%
Hits/6010.9811.5612.75-9%
Blks/605.505.785.34+8%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  10 · 18 · 22 · 6
PIMs/60
3-yr 4.8336.32Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 12.758.84Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 5.344.91Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
5.0322-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
11.5622-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
5.7822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
11622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
22922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
12522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskHits tailing off: Q4 8.84/60 and 2nd-half 9.54 below the 11.56 season rate — projected DOWN to 10.98/60, weighting the recent decline over the 12.75 3-yr mark.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 4.91/60 and 2nd-half 4.74 below the 5.78 season rate — projected DOWN to 5.50/60, weighting the recent decline over the 5.34 3-yr mark.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.38/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.