Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2680 GP | H238 GP | H142 GP | Prev 3204 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 23.17 | 23.34 | 21.84 | 21.79 | 21.98 |
| PP TOI | 3.00 | 3.02 | 2.96 | 3.08 | 2.55 |
| G | 20 | 27 | 25 | 29 | 17 |
| A | 34 | 35 | 38 | 32 | 31 |
| PTS | 54 | 62 | 63 | 61 | 49 |
| PPP | 17 | 18 | 22 | 16 | 16 |
| SOG | 209 | 226 | 170 | 277 | 212 |
| PIM | 60 | 63 | 59 | 68 | 57 |
| Hits | 54 | 59 | 44 | 73 | 75 |
| Blocks | 121 | 117 | 133 | 102 | 125 |
Sample: 80 GP · 1,472 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP ixG/60 finished the year 60% below where it started (2.65 in the first half, 1.06 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 59% above his 3-year rate last season (10.39 against 6.52).
Power play points ran at a 22 pace in the second half after 16 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting goals 26% below last season, 27 to 20.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 23.17 | 23.34 | 21.98 | +6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 18.23 | 18.40 | 18.02 | +2% |
| PP TOI | 3.00 | 3.02 | 2.55 | +18% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.03 | 5.87 | 6.02 | -3% |
| G/60 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.39 | +55% |
| iSH% | 8.46 | 10.39 | 6.52 | +59% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.36 | 0.27 | +32% |
| iCF/60 | – | 15.12 | 14.71 | +3% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 4.69 | 4.24 | +11% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.73 | 0.47 | +55% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 11.42 | 11.86 | 9.40 | +26% |
| IPP | 45.21 | 45.86 | 41.04 | +12% |
| 1A/60 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.30 | +65% |
| 2A/60 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.44 | +2% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.00 | 3.02 | 2.55 | +18% |
| PP iSH% | 13.57 | 14.31 | 13.00 | +10% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.88 | 13.91 | 14.19 | -2% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.92 | 1.53 | +26% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.91 | 2.08 | 1.70 | +23% |
| Hits/60 | 2.14 | 2.32 | 2.73 | -15% |
| Blks/60 | 4.22 | 3.99 | 4.56 | -12% |