Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2655 GP | H226 GP | H129 GP | Prev 3228 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 23.64 | 23.63 | 22.51 | 22.51 | 23.72 |
| PP TOI | 3.42 | 3.31 | 3.58 | 3.06 | 3.36 |
| G | 13 | 14 | 16 | 12 | 14 |
| A | 61 | 66 | 67 | 64 | 60 |
| PTS | 74 | 79 | 83 | 76 | 74 |
| PPP | 30 | 36 | 47 | 25 | 29 |
| SOG | 148 | 136 | 121 | 149 | 155 |
| PIM | 32 | 30 | 25 | 34 | 37 |
| Hits | 35 | 36 | 29 | 43 | 39 |
| Blocks | 117 | 110 | 102 | 118 | 120 |
Sample: 55 GP · 1,013 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 47 pace in the second half after 25 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 finished the year 81% below where it started (0.91 in the first half, 0.17 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 59% below his 3-year rate last season (3.38 against 8.25).
TOI sits in the 97th percentile league-wide (23.63).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 23.64 | 23.63 | 23.72 | -0% |
| 5v5 TOI | 18.15 | 18.43 | 17.25 | +7% |
| PP TOI | 3.42 | 3.31 | 3.36 | -1% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.55 | 3.55 | 4.22 | -16% |
| G/60 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.35 | -66% |
| iSH% | 6.79 | 3.38 | 8.25 | -59% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.25 | 0.29 | -15% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.25 | 9.82 | +15% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.37 | 3.92 | -14% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.83 | 0.95 | -12% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.64 | 9.87 | 9.30 | +6% |
| IPP | 49.72 | 48.87 | 50.97 | -4% |
| 1A/60 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.64 | -27% |
| 2A/60 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 0.50 | +41% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.42 | 3.31 | 3.36 | -1% |
| PP iSH% | 7.92 | 20.83 | 7.92 | +163% |
| PP SOG/60 | 7.80 | 7.92 | 7.92 | +0% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.58 | 0.80 | -28% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.81 | 0.95 | 1.10 | -14% |
| Hits/60 | 1.34 | 1.42 | 1.34 | +6% |
| Blks/60 | 3.83 | 3.79 | 3.89 | -3% |