Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2677 GP | H237 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3239 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 24.63 | 24.72 | 24.01 | 22.85 | 24.27 |
| PP TOI | 3.12 | 3.11 | 3.08 | 3.14 | 3.28 |
| G | 13 | 15 | 16 | 13 | 14 |
| A | 51 | 44 | 33 | 53 | 57 |
| PTS | 64 | 58 | 49 | 67 | 71 |
| PPP | 21 | 17 | 16 | 18 | 24 |
| SOG | 168 | 154 | 170 | 140 | 185 |
| PIM | 35 | 32 | 35 | 29 | 37 |
| Hits | 52 | 38 | 32 | 44 | 78 |
| Blocks | 116 | 126 | 109 | 141 | 108 |
Sample: 77 GP · 1,504 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
1A/60 finished the year 65% below where it started (0.88 in the first half, 0.31 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP SOG/60 finished the year 52% above where it started (6.21 in the first half, 9.44 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 52% above his 3-year rate last season (10.60 against 6.96).
Hits/60 ran 56% below his 3-year rate last season (1.16 against 2.66).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 24.63 | 24.72 | 24.27 | +2% |
| 5v5 TOI | 19.79 | 19.54 | 19.43 | +1% |
| PP TOI | 3.12 | 3.11 | 3.28 | -5% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.15 | 4.15 | 5.37 | -23% |
| G/60 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.37 | +18% |
| iSH% | 8.05 | 10.60 | 6.96 | +52% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.20 | 0.27 | -26% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.81 | 12.17 | -19% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.03 | 3.39 | -11% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.36 | 0.53 | -32% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.18 | 11.55 | 9.19 | +26% |
| IPP | 47.57 | 45.48 | 50.28 | -10% |
| 1A/60 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.58 | +3% |
| 2A/60 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.49 | -35% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.12 | 3.11 | 3.28 | -5% |
| PP iSH% | 7.83 | 6.44 | 8.27 | -22% |
| PP SOG/60 | 7.64 | 7.77 | 6.50 | +19% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.61 | 0.70 | -13% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.07 | 0.96 | 1.31 | -26% |
| Hits/60 | 1.56 | 1.16 | 2.66 | -56% |
| Blks/60 | 3.58 | 3.91 | 3.51 | +11% |