🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Jacob Trouba

SJS · Age 32.4 · 🇺🇸 USA · 6′3″, 203 lb · Draft 2012, 9th overall (WPG)
SJSteam
Dposition
25position rank
105skater rank
66overall
-39offense
105peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2681 GPH240 GPH141 GPPrev 3228 GP · 3y
TOI22.4622.8322.2221.3620.98
PP TOI0.690.700.820.570.57
G6108124
A2225272419
PTS2835353624
PPP21202
SOG165168174162158
PIM5432451873
Hits164145130159206
Blocks192152156149201

Sample: 81 GP · 1,457 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
We project it up
PIM
5422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting penalty minutes 69% above last season, 32 to 54.

Second-half fade
iSH%
3-yr 2.050.00Q1Q2Q3Q4

iSH% finished the year 52% below where it started (7.62 in the first half, 3.62 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

We project it down
G
622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting goals 40% below last season, 10 to 6.

Below his 3-year rate
Hits/60
5.1922-2323-2424-2525-26

Hits/60 ran 33% below his 3-year rate last season (5.19 against 7.78).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Darnell NurseD · San Jose Sharks83% match
    shared: Blocks, Hits, PIM, SOG
  • Adam LarssonD · Seattle Kraken83% match
    shared: Blocks, Hits
  • Kaiden GuhleD · Montreal Canadiens81% match
    shared: Blocks, Hits, PIM
  • Ben ChiarotD · Detroit Red Wings80% match
    shared: Hits, Blocks, PIM
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Jacob Trouba is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Quinn HughesD · Minnesota Wildcovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
    fills: SOG, A, PPP
  • Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Ryan Warsofsky (SJS)
Last year (ANA, traded): Joel Quenneville full season (1st yr) — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI22.4622.8320.98+9%
5v5 TOI17.9417.9917.22+4%
PP TOI0.690.700.57+22%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 21 · 19
TOI*
3-yr 20.9821.83Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 17.2218.12Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.570.62Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
22.4622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
17.9422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.6922-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/605.555.726.01-5%
G/600.240.330.12+168%
iSH%3.165.772.05+182%
ixG/600.210.23-9%
iCF/6012.3112.52-2%
iSCF/602.553.15-19%
iHDCF/600.580.55+5%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 21 · 19
SOG/60
3-yr 6.015.23Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 2.050.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.230.22Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 12.5212.37Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 3.152.44Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 0.550.70Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
5.7222-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
5.7722-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.2122-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
12.3122-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
2.5522-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.5822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
16522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 5.8% vs a 2.0% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.21 (23rd pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 3.2% pulls the goal rate ~28% down.
RiskAge 32 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%8.248.048.57-6%
IPP36.1243.3229.14+49%
1A/600.360.370.33+11%
2A/600.250.370.26+42%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 21 · 19
1A/60
3-yr 0.330.35Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.260.35Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.3722-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3722-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
2222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
2822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskIPP spiked to 43.3% vs 29.1% 3-yr — point participation this far above baseline rarely holds; assist share likely gives a little back.
RiskAssist gain leans on secondary helpers (2A/60 0.37 vs 3-yr 0.26) — the least repeatable slice; projected back toward baseline.
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.690.700.57+22%
PP iSH%4.490.008.01-100%
PP SOG/6011.6511.6811.54+1%
PP ixG/601.010.70+45%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 21 · 19
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.570.62Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 11.5415.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.700.91Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.7022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
11.6822-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
1.0122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~0.7 PP TOI/gp.
TailwindPP finishing ran cold (0.0% vs 8.0%) over steady PP chances — PP goals should rebound.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/601.601.192.57-54%
Hits/605.915.197.78-33%
Blks/605.825.066.97-27%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 20 · 21 · 19
PIMs/60
3-yr 2.571.05Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 7.785.58Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 6.974.88Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.1922-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
5.1922-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
5.0622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
5422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
16422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
19222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindHold high HITS/BLK/PIM lines for Trouba and Nurse; do not project offensive growth. · Apples & Ginos Fantasy Hockey
ContextHits role-stable at 5.19/60 (62nd pct league-wide) → 5.91 projected.
TailwindElite blocks volume (93rd pct) and role-stable — a bankable blocks floor (5.82/60 projected).