Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H243 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3245 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.62 | 21.37 | 20.43 | 21.10 | 22.59 |
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.17 |
| G | 6 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| A | 19 | 18 | 23 | 13 | 20 |
| PTS | 25 | 25 | 32 | 17 | 26 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 113 | 106 | 125 | 85 | 129 |
| PIM | 40 | 42 | 36 | 48 | 45 |
| Hits | 119 | 110 | 99 | 122 | 163 |
| Blocks | 148 | 163 | 148 | 179 | 152 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,486 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 23 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 70% above his 3-year rate last season (6.86 against 4.04).
SOG/60 finished the year 58% above where it started (3.18 in the first half, 5.03 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Blks/60 ran 28% above his 3-year rate last season (5.37 against 4.20).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.62 | 21.37 | 22.59 | -5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 18.13 | 18.12 | 18.71 | -3% |
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.17 | -50% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.11 | 4.08 | 4.56 | -10% |
| G/60 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.18 | +52% |
| iSH% | 4.89 | 6.86 | 4.04 | +70% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.14 | 0.20 | -31% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.56 | 10.57 | -19% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.22 | 2.72 | -18% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.12 | 0.47 | -74% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.20 | 8.88 | 9.84 | -10% |
| IPP | 39.31 | 46.33 | 30.33 | +53% |
| 1A/60 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.32 | +27% |
| 2A/60 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.36 | -12% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.17 | -50% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 2.94 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.38 | 0.18 | +108% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.52 | 1.61 | 1.58 | +2% |
| Hits/60 | 4.63 | 4.28 | 5.76 | -26% |
| Blks/60 | 4.87 | 5.37 | 4.20 | +28% |