Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H239 GP | H143 GP | Prev 3243 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.34 | 20.44 | 20.18 | 19.75 | 16.49 |
| PP TOI | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.05 |
| G | 5 | 2 | -0 | 4 | 5 |
| A | 17 | 16 | 22 | 10 | 14 |
| PTS | 22 | 18 | 22 | 14 | 20 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 102 | 102 | 106 | 98 | 91 |
| PIM | 28 | 26 | 31 | 21 | 17 |
| Hits | 168 | 163 | 156 | 169 | 155 |
| Blocks | 157 | 140 | 147 | 134 | 134 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,406 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 22 pace in the second half after 10 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 56% below his 3-year rate last season (2.22 against 5.05).
Penalty minutes ran at a 31 pace in the second half after 21 in the first, per 82 games.
TOI ran 24% above his 3-year rate last season (20.44 against 16.49).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.34 | 20.44 | 16.49 | +24% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.18 | 17.16 | 14.92 | +15% |
| PP TOI | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.05 | +706% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.05 | 4.05 | 4.22 | -4% |
| G/60 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.21 | -58% |
| iSH% | 4.20 | 2.22 | 5.05 | -56% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.16 | 0.17 | -6% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.19 | 9.58 | +6% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.30 | 2.55 | -10% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.38 | 0.43 | -11% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.92 | 10.14 | 9.26 | +10% |
| IPP | 31.64 | 31.30 | 32.67 | -4% |
| 1A/60 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.25 | +54% |
| 2A/60 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.38 | -32% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.05 | +706% |
| PP iSH% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.32 | 3.88 | 10.56 | -63% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.19 | 0.80 | -76% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.12 | 1.02 | 0.79 | +29% |
| Hits/60 | 6.50 | 6.31 | 7.18 | -12% |
| Blks/60 | 5.17 | 4.65 | 5.86 | -21% |