Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2671 GP | H233 GP | H138 GP | Prev 3201 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 23.07 | 23.16 | 22.50 | 21.25 | 24.48 |
| PP TOI | 3.00 | 2.74 | 2.74 | 2.73 | 3.34 |
| G | 11 | 16 | 13 | 19 | 10 |
| A | ▲55 | 53 | 59 | 48 | 44 |
| PTS | ▲66 | 69 | 72 | 67 | 54 |
| PPP | 17 | 16 | 20 | 13 | 19 |
| SOG | 182 | 178 | 179 | 177 | 190 |
| PIM | 28 | 37 | 45 | 31 | 30 |
| Hits | 41 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 65 |
| Blocks | 138 | 122 | 126 | 120 | 163 |
Sample: 71 GP · 1,190 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Baseline line is his 2025-26 Washington season. TB PP1 with Kucherov is the value driver, bet on the minutes (2.74 -> 3.2); held modest vs the 70-pt ceiling given age 36.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% ran 96% above his 3-year rate last season (6.19 against 3.17).
1A/60 ran 83% above his 3-year rate last season (0.76 against 0.42).
Power play points ran at a 20 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting hits 37% above last season, 30 to 41.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 23.07 | 23.16 | 24.48 | -5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.03 | 16.76 | 17.24 | -3% |
| PP TOI | 3.00 | 2.74 | 3.34 | -18% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.37 | 5.65 | 5.49 | +3% |
| G/60 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 0.17 | +102% |
| iSH% | 4.68 | 6.19 | 3.17 | +96% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.33 | 0.26 | +28% |
| iCF/60 | – | 13.51 | 13.33 | +1% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.83 | 4.02 | -5% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.91 | 0.64 | +41% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.31 | 10.65 | 8.78 | +21% |
| IPP | 48.96 | 50.61 | 41.43 | +22% |
| 1A/60 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.42 | +83% |
| 2A/60 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.50 | +10% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.00 | 2.74 | 3.34 | -18% |
| PP iSH% | 9.86 | 11.17 | 9.44 | +18% |
| PP SOG/60 | 7.57 | 5.55 | 9.48 | -41% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.62 | 1.15 | -46% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.13 | 1.41 | 0.86 | +63% |
| Hits/60 | 1.43 | 1.06 | 2.30 | -54% |
| Blks/60 | 4.24 | 3.83 | 4.85 | -21% |