Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H240 GP | H142 GP | Prev 3222 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.50 | 20.57 | 19.61 | 19.74 | 21.53 |
| PP TOI | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 1.04 |
| G | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 11 |
| A | 29 | 35 | 41 | 29 | 30 |
| PTS | 36 | 41 | 46 | 36 | 41 |
| PPP | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| SOG | 134 | 131 | 112 | 150 | 168 |
| PIM | 27 | 30 | 29 | 31 | 39 |
| Hits | 65 | 65 | 51 | 78 | 99 |
| Blocks | 114 | 125 | 124 | 126 | 100 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,429 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI ran 51% below his 3-year rate last season (0.51 against 1.04).
Assists ran at a 41 pace in the second half after 29 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits ran at a 51 pace in the second half after 78 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.50 | 20.57 | 21.53 | -4% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.20 | 17.43 | 17.30 | +1% |
| PP TOI | 0.56 | 0.51 | 1.04 | -51% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.69 | 4.91 | 6.11 | -20% |
| G/60 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.30 | -29% |
| iSH% | 4.67 | 4.28 | 4.84 | -12% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.27 | 0.31 | -13% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.75 | 13.20 | -11% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.65 | 4.09 | -11% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 1.09 | 0.89 | +22% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.14 | 10.94 | 9.22 | +19% |
| IPP | 38.85 | 39.38 | 37.88 | +4% |
| 1A/60 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.58 | -14% |
| 2A/60 | 0.48 | 0.67 | 0.35 | +94% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.56 | 0.51 | 1.04 | -51% |
| PP iSH% | 13.58 | 0.00 | 17.86 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.32 | 1.43 | 7.25 | -80% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.38 | 0.69 | -45% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.09 | 1.26 | 1.45 | -13% |
| Hits/60 | 2.53 | 2.52 | 3.70 | -32% |
| Blks/60 | 3.66 | 3.90 | 3.31 | +18% |