Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2677 GP | H241 GP | H136 GP | Prev 3232 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 24.31 | 24.19 | 22.76 | 23.14 | 25.17 |
| PP TOI | 3.45 | 3.47 | 3.46 | 3.48 | 3.27 |
| G | 19 | 20 | 27 | 12 | 18 |
| A | 55 | 59 | 62 | 54 | 52 |
| PTS | 74 | 79 | 89 | 66 | 71 |
| PPP | 25 | 23 | 22 | 25 | 26 |
| SOG | 214 | 208 | 186 | 233 | 226 |
| PIM | 70 | 81 | 78 | 84 | 75 |
| Hits | ▼70 | 71 | 77 | 65 | 141 |
| Blocks | ▼90 | 84 | 70 | 101 | 131 |
Sample: 77 GP · 1,435 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Hits cut kept (offensive role). Dropped the earlier A x0.90 'assists rode hot on-ice SH%' cut — his 1A/60 and iHDCF/60 are at career highs, so the process supports the assist level; the engine's (now process-aware) on-ice SH%/IPP regression handles what little luck remains. Peripherals revisited: HITS 0.60 -> 0.73 (the cut had gone below his own pace) and BLK trimmed to ~90 (both we and the outside read sat above his 84 actual).
Metrics worth highlighting
Goals ran at a 27 pace in the second half after 12 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits/60 ran 50% below his 3-year rate last season (2.26 against 4.50).
Points ran at a 89 pace in the second half after 66 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI sits in the 95th percentile league-wide (3.47).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 24.31 | 24.19 | 25.17 | -4% |
| 5v5 TOI | 18.59 | 18.65 | 19.38 | -4% |
| PP TOI | 3.45 | 3.47 | 3.27 | +6% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.35 | 5.47 | 5.92 | -8% |
| G/60 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.35 | +21% |
| iSH% | 6.77 | 7.68 | 5.86 | +31% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.34 | 0.28 | +19% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.41 | 12.02 | +3% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 4.14 | 3.90 | +6% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 1.17 | 0.82 | +43% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.43 | 10.79 | 8.76 | +23% |
| IPP | 55.61 | 57.67 | 46.21 | +25% |
| 1A/60 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.57 | +38% |
| 2A/60 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.41 | +63% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 3.45 | 3.47 | 3.27 | +6% |
| PP iSH% | 12.36 | 11.79 | 12.80 | -8% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.27 | 11.45 | 10.53 | +9% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.94 | 0.80 | +17% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.75 | 3.09 | 2.27 | +36% |
| Hits/60 | 3.05 | 2.26 | 4.50 | -50% |
| Blks/60 | 2.68 | 2.67 | 4.09 | -35% |