Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2679 GP | H240 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3231 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.03 | 18.99 | 17.97 | 17.66 | 19.30 |
| PP TOI | 1.75 | 1.68 | 1.52 | 1.84 | 2.76 |
| G | 34 | 34 | 41 | 27 | 33 |
| A | 35 | 34 | 23 | 46 | 39 |
| PTS | 69 | 69 | 64 | 73 | 73 |
| PPP | 10 | 9 | 12 | 6 | 15 |
| SOG | 207 | 202 | 194 | 211 | 216 |
| PIM | 45 | 59 | 33 | 86 | 43 |
| Hits | 80 | 85 | 82 | 88 | 71 |
| Blocks | 95 | 93 | 90 | 97 | 83 |
Sample: 79 GP · 1,082 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 12 pace in the second half after 6 in the first, per 82 games.
Assists ran at a 23 pace in the second half after 46 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI ran 39% below his 3-year rate last season (1.68 against 2.76).
PP SOG/60 ran 50% above his 3-year rate last season (12.68 against 8.46).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.03 | 18.99 | 19.30 | -2% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.86 | 13.70 | 13.60 | +1% |
| PP TOI | 1.75 | 1.68 | 2.76 | -39% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.87 | 7.87 | 8.06 | -2% |
| G/60 | 1.12 | 1.11 | 1.16 | -4% |
| iSH% | 14.22 | 14.10 | 14.42 | -2% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.81 | 0.82 | -1% |
| iCF/60 | – | 15.30 | 15.27 | +0% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.48 | 8.13 | -8% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.33 | 3.55 | -6% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 11.36 | 12.60 | 10.54 | +20% |
| IPP | 72.69 | 71.31 | 74.37 | -4% |
| 1A/60 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.80 | -10% |
| 2A/60 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.51 | +52% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.75 | 1.68 | 2.76 | -39% |
| PP iSH% | 18.13 | 25.00 | 14.47 | +73% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.63 | 12.68 | 8.46 | +50% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.19 | 1.72 | +28% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.96 | 2.61 | 1.81 | +44% |
| Hits/60 | 3.53 | 3.77 | 3.17 | +19% |
| Blks/60 | 3.23 | 3.16 | 3.34 | -5% |