🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Travis Konecny

PHI · Age 29.4 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 5′10″, 175 lb · Draft 2015, 24th overall (PHI)
PHIteam
RWposition
24position rank
71skater rank
81overall
29offense
52peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2677 GPH237 GPH140 GPPrev 3218 GP · 3y
TOI19.2319.0918.1417.4620.20
PP TOI3.102.823.212.462.91
G2729342433
A4444384844
PTS7172727277
PPP1515161415
SOG200180171188234
PIM6563666074
Hits10011512810390
Blocks3840354541

Sample: 77 GP · 1,085 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingRight wing · league-wide (of 273)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Context brain — deployment, role, coaching & injury signals (why the line should move)
TailwindSupport 5v5 baselines for Flyers transition forwards. · Coaching landscape report

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
iSH%
3-yr 10.7912.43Q1Q2Q3Q4

iSH% finished the year 93% above where it started (11.58 in the first half, 22.31 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half surge
G
2722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Goals ran at a 34 pace in the second half after 24 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate
Hits/60
5.4722-2323-2424-2525-26

Hits/60 ran 54% above his 3-year rate last season (5.47 against 3.56).

Above his 3-year rate
PP ixG/60
2.1522-2323-2424-2525-26

PP ixG/60 ran 22% above his 3-year rate last season (2.15 against 1.76).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Adrian KempeRW · Los Angeles Kings86% match
    shared: PIM, A, SOG, G
  • Brandon HagelLW · Tampa Bay Lightning83% match
    shared: PIM, A, SOG, G
  • Sam BennettC · Florida Panthers82% match
    shared: PIM, SOG, G, Hits
  • Brad MarchandLW,RW · Florida Panthers82% match
    shared: PIM, A, SOG, G
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Travis Konecny is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Rick Tocchet (PHI)
Last year: Rick Tocchet full season (1st yr) — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI19.2319.0920.20-6%
5v5 TOI14.1814.1014.53-3%
PP TOI3.102.822.91-3%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 21 · 18 · 19
TOI*
3-yr 20.2018.20Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 14.5314.27Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 2.913.07Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
19.2322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
14.1822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
3.1022-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/606.636.637.90-16%
G/600.881.110.85+30%
iSH%13.2916.7410.79+55%
ixG/600.630.71-12%
iCF/6012.0515.72-23%
iSCF/606.197.71-20%
iHDCF/603.042.97+2%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 21 · 18 · 19
SOG/60
3-yr 7.905.31Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 10.7912.43Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.710.41Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 15.7210.18Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 7.714.65Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 2.971.99Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
6.6322-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
16.7422-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.6322-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
12.0522-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
6.1922-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
3.0422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
2722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
20022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 16.7% vs a 10.8% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.63 (52nd pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 13.3% pulls the goal rate ~21% down.
RiskShot volume down 16% (5v5 SOG/60 6.63 vs 7.90) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%9.6311.388.40+35%
IPP79.4577.8581.49-4%
1A/600.800.720.89-19%
2A/600.490.500.42+20%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 21 · 18 · 19
1A/60
3-yr 0.890.44Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.420.22Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.7222-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.5022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
4422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
7122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindRaise assist/PPP baseline; treat the PP role as real. · Apples & Ginos Fantasy Hockey
RiskOn-ice SH% hot at 11.4% vs a 8.4% 3-yr mark — teammate finishing regresses (~8% is league-normal), so some assists come off.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI3.102.822.91-3%
PP iSH%11.845.8516.17-64%
PP SOG/609.519.409.94-5%
PP ixG/602.151.76+22%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 21 · 18 · 19
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 2.913.07Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 9.9412.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 1.762.26Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
2.8222-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
9.4022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
2.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
1522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
1022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindRaise assist/PPP baseline; treat the PP role as real. · Apples & Ginos Fantasy Hockey
TailwindPP role projected up: 2.8→3.1 PP TOI/gp (same coach (Rick Tocchet) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 3.2, Q4 3.1) over the full-year 2.8; Raise assist/PPP baseline; treat the PP role as real.) — the biggest PPP lever.
TailwindPP finishing ran cold (5.9% vs 16.2%) over steady PP chances — PP goals should rebound.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/602.542.382.48-4%
Hits/604.715.473.56+54%
Blks/601.481.601.46+10%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 21 · 18 · 19
PIMs/60
3-yr 2.483.10Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 3.565.75Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 1.461.33Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
2.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
5.4722-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
1.6022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
6522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
10022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
3822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 5.47/60 (64th pct league-wide) → 4.71 projected.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.33/60 and 2nd-half 1.27 below the 1.60 season rate — projected DOWN to 1.48/60, weighting the recent decline over the 1.46 3-yr mark.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.06/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.