Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H241 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3218 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.24 | 16.37 | 16.09 | 15.73 | 16.97 |
| PP TOI | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.59 |
| G | 10 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| A | 25 | 19 | 22 | 16 | 30 |
| PTS | 35 | 28 | 29 | 27 | 42 |
| PPP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| SOG | 115 | 114 | 106 | 122 | 140 |
| PIM | 66 | 66 | 50 | 82 | 72 |
| Hits | 117 | 115 | 120 | 110 | 144 |
| Blocks | 35 | 31 | 27 | 35 | 52 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,121 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 22 pace in the second half after 16 in the first, per 82 games.
Goals ran at a 7 pace in the second half after 11 in the first, per 82 games.
Blks/60 ran 48% below his 3-year rate last season (1.07 against 2.04).
We’re projecting points 25% above last season, 28 to 35.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.24 | 16.37 | 16.97 | -4% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.58 | 13.68 | 14.02 | -2% |
| PP TOI | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.59 | -67% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.19 | 5.35 | 6.30 | -15% |
| G/60 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.41 | +4% |
| iSH% | 7.18 | 8.04 | 6.56 | +22% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.63 | 0.74 | -15% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.22 | 11.85 | -14% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.46 | 6.55 | -17% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.00 | 3.47 | -14% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.84 | 7.35 | 8.65 | -15% |
| IPP | 70.14 | 71.93 | 67.95 | +6% |
| 1A/60 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.73 | -27% |
| 2A/60 | 0.56 | 0.27 | 0.61 | -55% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.59 | -67% |
| PP iSH% | 13.77 | 0.00 | 17.66 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 7.62 | 7.52 | 7.90 | -5% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.70 | 2.05 | -17% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.68 | 2.67 | 3.28 | -19% |
| Hits/60 | 5.96 | 5.83 | 6.95 | -16% |
| Blks/60 | 1.18 | 1.07 | 2.04 | -48% |