🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Peyton Krebs

BUF · Age 25.5 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′0″, 187 lb · Draft 2019, 17th overall (VGK)
BUFteam
C,RWposition
105position rank
379skater rank
-3overall
-36offense
33peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2682 GPH242 GPH140 GPPrev 3235 GP · 3y
TOI13.7213.7613.0813.4913.42
PP TOI0.130.090.070.110.68
G9121778
A2327302417
PTS3239473125
PPP11021
SOG8893899781
PIM6578807662
Hits170201208194117
Blocks3241305226

Sample: 82 GP · 1,070 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingCentre · league-wide (of 271)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
1A/60
3-yr 0.411.23Q1Q2Q3Q4

1A/60 finished the year 150% above where it started (0.46 in the first half, 1.22 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half surge
PTS
3222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Points ran at a 47 pace in the second half after 31 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate
Hits/60
11.1022-2323-2424-2525-26

Hits/60 ran 58% above his 3-year rate last season (11.10 against 7.02).

Above his 3-year rate
Blks/60
2.2422-2323-2424-2525-26

Blks/60 ran 46% above his 3-year rate last season (2.24 against 1.53).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Peyton Krebs is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 4
    fills: SOG, PPP, A, G
  • Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 4
    fills: SOG, A, PPP, G
  • Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 4
    fills: A, PPP, SOG, G
  • William NylanderRW · Toronto Maple Leafscovers 4
    fills: PPP, SOG, G, A
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Lindy Ruff (BUF)
Last year: Lindy Ruff full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI13.7213.7613.42+3%
5v5 TOI12.9813.0511.86+10%
PP TOI0.130.090.68-87%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 24 · 18
TOI*
3-yr 13.4213.79Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 11.8613.54Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.680.11Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
13.7222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
12.9822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.1322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/604.774.774.54+5%
G/600.400.390.39-0%
iSH%8.338.188.59-5%
ixG/600.480.46+4%
iCF/609.649.60+0%
iSCF/605.165.25-2%
iHDCF/602.132.00+6%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 24 · 18
SOG/60
3-yr 4.546.15Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 8.5912.03Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.460.38Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 9.6010.09Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 5.255.91Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 2.001.23Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
4.7722-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
8.1822-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.4822-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
9.6422-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
5.1622-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
2.1322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
8822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindProcess rising: 5v5 ixG/60 0.48 (37th pct league-wide) up on the 3-yr 0.46 — the shot quality is real, so the projected goal rate leans on chances, not a hot %.
ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 0.54 (1st half) to 0.42 (2nd) even though shot volume held — a chance-quality dip, not a volume one.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%10.0010.608.54+24%
IPP58.8358.7459.17-1%
1A/600.660.840.41+105%
2A/600.510.450.51-12%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 24 · 18
1A/60
3-yr 0.411.23Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.510.25Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.8422-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.4522-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
2322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
3222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskOn-ice SH% hot at 10.6% vs a 8.5% 3-yr mark — teammate finishing regresses (~8% is league-normal), so some assists come off.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.130.090.68-87%
PP iSH%14.150.0018.14-100%
PP SOG/608.918.314.15+100%
PP ixG/600.720.94-24%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 24 · 18
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.680.11Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 4.1530.77Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.942.67Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0922-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
8.3122-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.7222-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPP role projected up: 0.1→0.1 PP TOI/gp (reverts toward the 3-yr 0.7) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/603.484.043.62+12%
Hits/609.4711.107.02+58%
Blks/601.952.241.53+46%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 24 · 18
PIMs/60
3-yr 3.620.49Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 7.0212.31Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 1.532.22Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
4.0422-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
11.1022-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
2.2422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
6522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
17022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
3222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindElite hits volume (87th pct) and role-stable — a bankable hits floor (9.47/60 projected).
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 2.22/60 and 2nd-half 1.72 below the 2.24 season rate — projected DOWN to 1.95/60, weighting the recent decline over the 1.53 3-yr mark.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.22/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.