🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Josh Anderson

MTL · Age 32.2 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′3″, 218 lb · Draft 2012, 95th overall (CBJ)
MTLteam
LW,RWposition
98position rank
271skater rank
13overall
-41offense
54peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2672 GPH232 GPH140 GPPrev 3228 GP · 3y
TOI14.3214.0213.2513.8015.51
PP TOI0.120.080.050.121.15
G1516151716
A101012812
PTS2526272528
PPP00002
SOG11110194108149
PIM99911097785
Hits143147139154174
Blocks4349514743

Sample: 72 GP · 808 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingLeft wing · league-wide (of 281)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
ixG/60
3-yr 0.850.88Q1Q2Q3Q4

ixG/60 finished the year 50% above where it started (0.61 in the first half, 0.92 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half surge
iHDCF/60
3-yr 4.124.11Q1Q2Q3Q4

iHDCF/60 finished the year 68% above where it started (2.75 in the first half, 4.62 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Below his 3-year rate
1A/60
0.2222-2323-2424-2525-26

1A/60 ran 40% below his 3-year rate last season (0.22 against 0.37).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Zachary L'HeureuxLW,RW · Colorado Avalanche93% match
    shared: PIM, Hits
  • Dakota JoshuaLW · Toronto Maple Leafs93% match
    shared: PIM, Hits, Blocks
  • Jack McBainC,LW · Utah Mammoth92% match
    shared: PIM, Hits, Blocks
  • Ridly GreigC,LW,RW · Ottawa Senators92% match
    shared: PIM, Hits, Blocks
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Josh Anderson is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 4
    fills: SOG, PPP, A, G
  • Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 4
    fills: SOG, A, PPP, G
  • Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 4
    fills: A, PPP, SOG, G
  • William NylanderRW · Toronto Maple Leafscovers 4
    fills: PPP, SOG, G, A
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Martin St. Louis (MTL)
Last year: Martin St. Louis full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI14.3214.0215.51-10%
5v5 TOI11.4311.2312.84-13%
PP TOI0.120.081.15-93%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 16 · 16
TOI*
3-yr 15.5113.24Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 12.8410.94Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 1.150.05Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
14.3222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
11.4322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.1222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/604.975.126.76-24%
G/600.600.740.70+6%
iSH%12.0514.4510.31+40%
ixG/600.750.85-11%
iCF/6010.2412.87-20%
iSCF/606.988.59-19%
iHDCF/603.564.12-14%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 16 · 16
SOG/60
3-yr 6.765.14Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 10.3113.42Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.850.88Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 12.878.91Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 8.597.88Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 4.124.11Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
5.1222-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
14.4522-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.7522-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
10.2422-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
6.9822-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
3.5622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
1522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
11122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 14.5% vs a 10.3% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.75 (68th pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 12.0% pulls the goal rate ~19% down.
RiskShot volume down 24% (5v5 SOG/60 5.12 vs 6.76) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.
TailwindTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 climbed 0.61→0.92 across the year — process trending the right way into next season.
RiskAge 32 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%9.499.439.55-1%
IPP55.8358.6052.44+12%
1A/600.270.220.37-40%
2A/600.250.300.21+45%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 16 · 16
1A/60
3-yr 0.370.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.210.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.2222-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
2522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 9.4%, IPP 58.6%).
RiskAssist gain leans on secondary helpers (2A/60 0.30 vs 3-yr 0.21) — the least repeatable slice; projected back toward baseline.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.120.081.15-93%
PP iSH%4.540.007.83-100%
PP SOG/6026.8629.5111.64+154%
PP ixG/602.301.96+17%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 16 · 16
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 1.150.05Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 11.6478.26Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 1.966.95Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0822-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
29.5122-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
2.3022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPP role projected up: 0.1→0.1 PP TOI/gp (role tapered late (Q4 0.0 vs 0.1 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish) — the biggest PPP lever.
TailwindPP finishing ran cold (0.0% vs 7.8%) over steady PP chances — PP goals should rebound.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/605.735.204.08+27%
Hits/608.679.069.22-2%
Blks/602.242.382.03+17%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 16 · 16
PIMs/60
3-yr 4.0810.28Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 9.228.91Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.032.06Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
5.2022-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
9.0622-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
2.3822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
9922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
14322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
4322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 9.06/60 (82nd pct league-wide) → 8.67 projected.
ContextBlocks role-stable at 2.38/60 (45th pct league-wide) → 2.24 projected.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.30/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.