Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2672 GP | H232 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3228 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.32 | 14.02 | 13.25 | 13.80 | 15.51 |
| PP TOI | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 1.15 |
| G | 15 | 16 | 15 | 17 | 16 |
| A | 10 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 12 |
| PTS | 25 | 26 | 27 | 25 | 28 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SOG | 111 | 101 | 94 | 108 | 149 |
| PIM | 99 | 91 | 109 | 77 | 85 |
| Hits | 143 | 147 | 139 | 154 | 174 |
| Blocks | 43 | 49 | 51 | 47 | 43 |
Sample: 72 GP · 808 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
ixG/60 finished the year 50% above where it started (0.61 in the first half, 0.92 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iHDCF/60 finished the year 68% above where it started (2.75 in the first half, 4.62 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 40% below his 3-year rate last season (0.22 against 0.37).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.32 | 14.02 | 15.51 | -10% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.43 | 11.23 | 12.84 | -13% |
| PP TOI | 0.12 | 0.08 | 1.15 | -93% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.97 | 5.12 | 6.76 | -24% |
| G/60 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.70 | +6% |
| iSH% | 12.05 | 14.45 | 10.31 | +40% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.75 | 0.85 | -11% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.24 | 12.87 | -20% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.98 | 8.59 | -19% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.56 | 4.12 | -14% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.49 | 9.43 | 9.55 | -1% |
| IPP | 55.83 | 58.60 | 52.44 | +12% |
| 1A/60 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.37 | -40% |
| 2A/60 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.21 | +45% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.12 | 0.08 | 1.15 | -93% |
| PP iSH% | 4.54 | 0.00 | 7.83 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 26.86 | 29.51 | 11.64 | +154% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.30 | 1.96 | +17% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 5.73 | 5.20 | 4.08 | +27% |
| Hits/60 | 8.67 | 9.06 | 9.22 | -2% |
| Blks/60 | 2.24 | 2.38 | 2.03 | +17% |