Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2655 GP | H219 GP | H136 GP | Prev 3199 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.37 | 12.25 | 12.34 | 11.92 | 12.84 |
| PP TOI | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 0.03 | 0.32 |
| G | 13 | 15 | 17 | 14 | 15 |
| A | 12 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 14 |
| PTS | 25 | 27 | 36 | 22 | 28 |
| PPP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SOG | 80 | 78 | 81 | 76 | 85 |
| PIM | 66 | 73 | 103 | 57 | 65 |
| Hits | 275 | 291 | 298 | 287 | 271 |
| Blocks | 40 | 48 | 33 | 55 | 40 |
Sample: 55 GP · 616 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Points ran at a 36 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.
Penalty minutes ran at a 103 pace in the second half after 57 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits/60 sits in the 97th percentile league-wide (18.67).
ixG/60 ran 16% below his 3-year rate last season (0.69 against 0.83).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.37 | 12.25 | 12.84 | -5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.17 | 11.22 | 11.18 | +0% |
| PP TOI | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.32 | -18% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.38 | 4.47 | 4.94 | -9% |
| G/60 | 0.79 | 0.97 | 0.76 | +28% |
| iSH% | 18.02 | 21.70 | 15.36 | +41% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.69 | 0.83 | -16% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.97 | 8.85 | -10% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.74 | 6.82 | -16% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.50 | 4.39 | -20% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.66 | 11.61 | 8.12 | +43% |
| IPP | 67.23 | 62.74 | 75.44 | -17% |
| 1A/60 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.46 | +7% |
| 2A/60 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.35 | -45% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.32 | -18% |
| PP iSH% | 17.40 | 0.00 | 30.00 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.79 | 16.65 | 9.39 | +77% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 4.71 | 2.23 | +112% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 4.76 | 4.57 | 3.94 | +16% |
| Hits/60 | 18.04 | 18.67 | 17.10 | +9% |
| Blks/60 | 2.17 | 2.63 | 2.00 | +32% |