🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Dakota Joshua

TOR · Age 30.2 · 🇺🇸 USA · 6′3″, 206 lb · Draft 2014, 128th overall (TOR)
TORteam
LWposition
92position rank
250skater rank
17overall
-39offense
56peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2655 GPH219 GPH136 GPPrev 3199 GP · 3y
TOI12.3712.2512.3411.9212.84
PP TOI0.380.260.700.030.32
G1315171415
A121219814
PTS2527362228
PPP20002
SOG8078817685
PIM66731035765
Hits275291298287271
Blocks4048335540

Sample: 55 GP · 616 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingLeft wing · league-wide (of 281)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
PTS
2522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Points ran at a 36 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half surge
PIM
6622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Penalty minutes ran at a 103 pace in the second half after 57 in the first, per 82 games.

Top of the league
Hits/60
18.6722-2323-2424-2525-26

Hits/60 sits in the 97th percentile league-wide (18.67).

Below his 3-year rate
ixG/60
0.6922-2323-2424-2525-26

ixG/60 ran 16% below his 3-year rate last season (0.69 against 0.83).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Forward
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Dakota Joshua is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 4
    fills: SOG, PPP, A, G
  • Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 4
    fills: SOG, A, PPP, G
  • Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 4
    fills: A, PPP, SOG, G
  • William NylanderRW · Toronto Maple Leafscovers 4
    fills: PPP, SOG, G, A
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Jim Hiller (TOR) new voice
Last year: Craig Berube full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI12.3712.2512.84-5%
5v5 TOI11.1711.2211.18+0%
PP TOI0.380.260.32-18%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 15 · 6 · 13
TOI*
3-yr 12.8412.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 11.1810.73Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.321.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
12.3722-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
11.1722-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.3822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/604.384.474.94-9%
G/600.790.970.76+28%
iSH%18.0221.7015.36+41%
ixG/600.690.83-16%
iCF/607.978.85-10%
iSCF/605.746.82-16%
iHDCF/603.504.39-20%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 15 · 6 · 13
SOG/60
3-yr 4.944.73Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 15.3627.27Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.830.95Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 8.859.03Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 6.827.31Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 4.393.87Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
4.4722-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
21.7022-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.6922-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
7.9722-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
5.7422-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
3.5022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
1322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
8022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 21.7% vs a 15.4% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.69 (60th pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 18.0% pulls the goal rate ~19% down.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%9.6611.618.12+43%
IPP67.2362.7475.44-17%
1A/600.480.490.46+7%
2A/600.230.190.35-45%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 15 · 6 · 13
1A/60
3-yr 0.460.86Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.350.43Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.4922-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.1922-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
2522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskOn-ice SH% hot at 11.6% vs a 8.1% 3-yr mark — teammate finishing regresses (~8% is league-normal), so some assists come off.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.380.260.32-18%
PP iSH%17.400.0030.00-100%
PP SOG/6012.7916.659.39+77%
PP ixG/604.712.23+112%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 15 · 6 · 13
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.321.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 9.3918.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 2.235.10Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.2622-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
16.6522-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
4.7122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPP role projected up: 0.3→0.4 PP TOI/gp (new coach (Jim Hiller) — late-year 0.7 role discounted until the new staff sets usage) — the biggest PPP lever.
TailwindPP finishing ran cold (0.0% vs 30.0%) over steady PP chances — PP goals should rebound.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/604.764.573.94+16%
Hits/6018.0418.6717.10+9%
Blks/602.172.632.00+32%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 15 · 6 · 13
PIMs/60
3-yr 3.948.60Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 17.1018.92Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 2.000.86Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
4.5722-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
18.6722-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
2.6322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
6622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
27522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
4022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindElite hits volume (97th pct) and role-stable — a bankable hits floor (18.04/60 projected).
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 0.86/60 and 2nd-half 2.13 below the 2.63 season rate — projected DOWN to 2.17/60, weighting the recent decline over the 2.00 3-yr mark.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.29/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.