Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2679 GP | H238 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3239 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.94 | 14.97 | 13.78 | 15.25 | 16.83 |
| PP TOI | 2.88 | 2.95 | 2.88 | 3.00 | 3.07 |
| G | 23 | 20 | 21 | 18 | 33 |
| A | 27 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 29 |
| PTS | 50 | 51 | 53 | 49 | 63 |
| PPP | 18 | 16 | 22 | 10 | 20 |
| SOG | 182 | 178 | 184 | 173 | 250 |
| PIM | 14 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 19 |
| Hits | 47 | 50 | 43 | 56 | 64 |
| Blocks | 23 | 32 | 21 | 42 | 19 |
Sample: 79 GP · 914 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 22 pace in the second half after 10 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 finished the year 53% below where it started (0.97 in the first half, 0.45 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
SOG/60 ran 31% below his 3-year rate last season (7.02 against 10.15).
PIMs/60 ran 55% below his 3-year rate last season (0.39 against 0.87).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.94 | 14.97 | 16.83 | -11% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.22 | 11.58 | 12.67 | -9% |
| PP TOI | 2.88 | 2.95 | 3.07 | -4% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.81 | 7.02 | 10.15 | -31% |
| G/60 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.11 | -35% |
| iSH% | 10.63 | 10.26 | 10.90 | -6% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.68 | 0.91 | -25% |
| iCF/60 | – | 15.28 | 18.15 | -16% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.54 | 9.29 | -19% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.82 | 3.43 | -18% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.04 | 10.67 | 9.18 | +16% |
| IPP | 71.92 | 73.82 | 67.78 | +9% |
| 1A/60 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.55 | +30% |
| 2A/60 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.41 | +42% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.88 | 2.95 | 3.07 | -4% |
| PP iSH% | 13.23 | 9.69 | 15.79 | -39% |
| PP SOG/60 | 15.49 | 15.99 | 14.00 | +14% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.91 | 2.38 | +22% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.87 | -55% |
| Hits/60 | 2.93 | 3.02 | 3.35 | -10% |
| Blks/60 | 1.25 | 1.71 | 1.01 | +70% |