Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2672 GP | H239 GP | H133 GP | Prev 3243 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.49 | 15.73 | 14.79 | 15.24 | 17.94 |
| PP TOI | 2.42 | 2.17 | 2.11 | 2.23 | 2.71 |
| G | ▲32 | 20 | 19 | 22 | 35 |
| A | ▲37 | 32 | 39 | 23 | 36 |
| PTS | ▲69 | 52 | 58 | 45 | 71 |
| PPP | 18 | 16 | 21 | 10 | 21 |
| SOG | 217 | 197 | 195 | 199 | 257 |
| PIM | 16 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 22 |
| Hits | 19 | 16 | 14 | 18 | 30 |
| Blocks | 32 | 32 | 31 | 33 | 32 |
Sample: 72 GP · 922 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Baseline is his 2025-26 St. Louis season. Washington rebuilt around Kyrou/Tuch/Protas; 70-pt target.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 21 pace in the second half after 10 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting goals 60% above last season, 20 to 32.
Assists ran at a 39 pace in the second half after 23 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting points 33% above last season, 52 to 69.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.49 | 15.73 | 17.94 | -12% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.25 | 12.81 | 14.17 | -10% |
| PP TOI | 2.42 | 2.17 | 2.71 | -20% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 8.65 | 8.65 | 10.06 | -14% |
| G/60 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 1.20 | -35% |
| iSH% | 10.14 | 9.02 | 11.96 | -25% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.87 | 0.81 | +7% |
| iCF/60 | – | 18.02 | 17.99 | +0% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 10.21 | 9.85 | +4% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.19 | 3.10 | +3% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.88 | 9.65 | 10.24 | -6% |
| IPP | 71.88 | 69.23 | 75.97 | -9% |
| 1A/60 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.71 | +10% |
| 2A/60 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.40 | -18% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.42 | 2.17 | 2.71 | -20% |
| PP iSH% | 17.82 | 13.81 | 18.95 | -27% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.27 | 11.15 | 12.47 | -11% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.52 | 1.61 | -6% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.91 | -43% |
| Hits/60 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 1.41 | -49% |
| Blks/60 | 1.61 | 1.63 | 1.50 | +9% |