Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2678 GP | H236 GP | H142 GP | Prev 3162 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.84 | 16.91 | 15.93 | 16.35 | 16.40 |
| PP TOI | 1.59 | 1.62 | 1.59 | 1.64 | 1.48 |
| G | 20 | 15 | 18 | 12 | 22 |
| A | 31 | 34 | 35 | 33 | 23 |
| PTS | 51 | 49 | 53 | 44 | 45 |
| PPP | 8 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| SOG | 154 | 149 | 137 | 159 | 158 |
| PIM | 43 | 31 | 38 | 26 | 42 |
| Hits | 45 | 47 | 52 | 43 | 43 |
| Blocks | 42 | 47 | 48 | 46 | 38 |
Sample: 78 GP · 974 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% finished the year 120% above where it started (6.40 in the first half, 14.07 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 134% above his 3-year rate last season (1.05 against 0.45).
Goals ran at a 18 pace in the second half after 12 in the first, per 82 games.
Blks/60 ran 26% above his 3-year rate last season (2.34 against 1.85).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.84 | 16.91 | 16.40 | +3% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.45 | 12.49 | 13.16 | -5% |
| PP TOI | 1.59 | 1.62 | 1.48 | +10% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 7.12 | -9% |
| G/60 | 0.78 | 0.62 | 0.98 | -37% |
| iSH% | 12.04 | 9.58 | 13.83 | -31% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.86 | 0.95 | -9% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.33 | 13.42 | -16% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.14 | 8.64 | -17% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.13 | 4.47 | -8% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.87 | 11.15 | 10.01 | +11% |
| IPP | 73.51 | 75.00 | 69.00 | +9% |
| 1A/60 | 0.79 | 1.05 | 0.45 | +134% |
| 2A/60 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.45 | +21% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.59 | 1.62 | 1.48 | +10% |
| PP iSH% | 14.31 | 10.52 | 15.37 | -32% |
| PP SOG/60 | 9.18 | 9.03 | 9.78 | -8% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.03 | 2.10 | -3% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.74 | 1.35 | 1.63 | -17% |
| Hits/60 | 2.44 | 2.52 | 2.19 | +15% |
| Blks/60 | 2.25 | 2.34 | 1.85 | +26% |