Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2678 GP | H239 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3153 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.58 | 16.65 | 15.30 | 16.70 | 17.55 |
| PP TOI | 0.71 | 0.87 | 0.38 | 1.35 | 1.95 |
| G | 11 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 14 |
| A | 24 | 25 | 18 | 33 | 31 |
| PTS | 35 | 38 | 31 | 45 | 45 |
| PPP | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| SOG | 128 | 125 | 108 | 142 | 186 |
| PIM | 31 | 32 | 29 | 34 | 38 |
| Hits | 109 | 105 | 130 | 80 | 60 |
| Blocks | 39 | 44 | 37 | 51 | 46 |
Sample: 78 GP · 996 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI finished the year 74% below where it started (1.38 in the first half, 0.36 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 89% above his 3-year rate last season (11.72 against 6.21).
Hits/60 finished the year 84% above where it started (4.11 in the first half, 7.54 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 42% below his 3-year rate last season (0.36 against 0.62).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.58 | 16.65 | 17.55 | -5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.50 | 12.77 | 13.96 | -9% |
| PP TOI | 0.71 | 0.87 | 1.95 | -56% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.89 | 5.12 | 7.25 | -29% |
| G/60 | 0.43 | 0.60 | 0.45 | +33% |
| iSH% | 8.53 | 11.72 | 6.21 | +89% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.68 | 0.79 | -14% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.08 | 12.56 | -12% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.45 | 6.72 | -4% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.31 | 3.62 | -9% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.99 | 9.03 | 8.94 | +1% |
| IPP | 62.69 | 70.40 | 57.55 | +22% |
| 1A/60 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.62 | -42% |
| 2A/60 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.56 | +7% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.71 | 0.87 | 1.95 | -56% |
| PP iSH% | 5.78 | 0.00 | 7.41 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.37 | 11.55 | 10.87 | +6% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.60 | 1.87 | -15% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.63 | 1.69 | 1.74 | -3% |
| Hits/60 | 6.07 | 5.66 | 3.09 | +83% |
| Blks/60 | 1.73 | 1.87 | 2.17 | -14% |