Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2664 GP | H241 GP | H123 GP | Prev 3240 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.86 | 14.35 | 14.34 | 13.27 | 16.16 |
| PP TOI | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.03 | 1.20 |
| G | 15 | 17 | 19 | 15 | 15 |
| A | 17 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 24 |
| PTS | 32 | 26 | 28 | 24 | 39 |
| PPP | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| SOG | 133 | 122 | 128 | 108 | 158 |
| PIM | 43 | 40 | 46 | 24 | 52 |
| Hits | 153 | 154 | 158 | 134 | 167 |
| Blocks | 55 | 54 | 53 | 54 | 54 |
Sample: 64 GP · 736 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI ran 70% below his 3-year rate last season (0.36 against 1.20).
Penalty minutes ran at a 46 pace in the second half after 24 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 78% above his 3-year rate last season (12.58 against 7.08).
1A/60 finished the year 53% below where it started (0.53 in the first half, 0.25 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.86 | 14.35 | 16.16 | -11% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.91 | 11.50 | 12.50 | -8% |
| PP TOI | 0.52 | 0.36 | 1.20 | -70% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.25 | 6.44 | 7.04 | -9% |
| G/60 | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.50 | +62% |
| iSH% | 10.49 | 12.58 | 7.08 | +78% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.73 | 0.58 | +26% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.55 | 12.48 | +1% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.03 | 5.72 | +5% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.42 | 2.52 | +36% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.52 | 7.50 | 7.58 | -1% |
| IPP | 66.44 | 68.16 | 62.23 | +10% |
| 1A/60 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.48 | -31% |
| 2A/60 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.40 | -80% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.52 | 0.36 | 1.20 | -70% |
| PP iSH% | 14.25 | 20.02 | 14.25 | +41% |
| PP SOG/60 | 10.11 | 13.19 | 8.72 | +51% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.72 | 1.41 | +22% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.07 | 2.04 | 2.38 | -14% |
| Hits/60 | 8.85 | 9.29 | 9.36 | -1% |
| Blks/60 | 2.39 | 2.36 | 2.44 | -3% |