Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2675 GP | H241 GP | H134 GP | Prev 3211 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.35 | 14.54 | 13.91 | 14.52 | 14.62 |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| G | 10 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 15 |
| A | 13 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 14 |
| PTS | 23 | 23 | 23 | 22 | 29 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 70 | 72 | 62 | 84 | 81 |
| PIM | 64 | 80 | 89 | 69 | 50 |
| Hits | 137 | 153 | 176 | 125 | 148 |
| Blocks | 61 | 55 | 51 | 58 | 82 |
Sample: 75 GP · 892 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% ran 64% below his 3-year rate last season (6.68 against 18.61).
Hits ran at a 176 pace in the second half after 125 in the first, per 82 games.
PIMs/60 ran 82% above his 3-year rate last season (4.37 against 2.40).
We’re projecting assists 24% below last season, 17 to 13.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.35 | 14.54 | 14.62 | -1% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.48 | 11.89 | 11.73 | +1% |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | +43% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.92 | 4.04 | 4.44 | -9% |
| G/60 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.83 | -67% |
| iSH% | 13.60 | 6.68 | 18.61 | -64% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.59 | 0.62 | -5% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.34 | 8.12 | +3% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.99 | 5.79 | +3% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.96 | 3.03 | -2% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.15 | 6.01 | 9.02 | -33% |
| IPP | 69.08 | 76.60 | 64.07 | +20% |
| 1A/60 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.39 | -82% |
| 2A/60 | 0.39 | 0.74 | 0.22 | +239% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | +43% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.88 | 4.37 | 2.40 | +82% |
| Hits/60 | 8.47 | 9.15 | 8.56 | +7% |
| Blks/60 | 2.53 | 2.29 | 3.18 | -28% |