Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2673 GP | H237 GP | H136 GP | Prev 3thin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.86 | 13.30 | 13.53 | 12.72 | – |
| PP TOI | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.60 | – |
| G | 15 | 13 | 13 | 14 | – |
| A | 20 | 17 | 11 | 23 | – |
| PTS | 35 | 30 | 24 | 37 | – |
| PPP | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | – |
| SOG | 97 | 89 | 86 | 91 | – |
| PIM | 39 | 31 | 46 | 16 | – |
| Hits | 81 | 70 | 85 | 54 | – |
| Blocks | 48 | 48 | 38 | 59 | – |
Sample: 73 GP · 893 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Both depth charts have him on the 2nd power play unit in his 2nd NHL season. The bump stays small on purpose: his even strength scoring rate faded through last season, so this bet moves the minutes and leaves the rate alone.
Metrics worth highlighting
Hits ran at a 85 pace in the second half after 54 in the first, per 82 games.
Assists ran at a 11 pace in the second half after 23 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting penalty minutes 26% above last season, 31 to 39.
We’re projecting goals 15% above last season, 13 to 15.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 13.86 | 13.30 | n/a | |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.88 | 12.24 | n/a | |
| PP TOI | 1.25 | 0.63 | n/a |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.19 | 5.04 | n/a | |
| G/60 | 0.76 | 0.74 | n/a | |
| iSH% | 14.68 | 14.68 | n/a | |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.78 | n/a | |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.81 | n/a | |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.32 | n/a | |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.10 | n/a |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.62 | 9.62 | n/a | |
| IPP | 63.14 | 63.14 | n/a | |
| 1A/60 | 0.34 | 0.34 | n/a | |
| 2A/60 | 0.54 | 0.54 | n/a |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.25 | 0.63 | n/a | |
| PP iSH% | 24.95 | 24.95 | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.95 | 5.21 | n/a | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.64 | n/a |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.23 | 1.75 | n/a | |
| Hits/60 | 4.44 | 3.96 | n/a | |
| Blks/60 | 2.71 | 2.89 | n/a |