Per 82 GP	2026-27projection	2025-2621 GP	H212 GP	H19 GP	Prev 3140 GP · 3y
TOI	12.43	11.81	11.45	12.67	14.54
PP TOI	0.38	0.26	0.46	0.20	1.90
G	14	8	10	-0	19
A	14	12	0	27	18
PTS	28	20	10	27	37
PPP	2	0	0	0	12
SOG	100	117	117	95	115
PIM	40	62	61	55	43
Hits	119	172	219	150	107
Blocks	37	35	41	36	43

Sample: 21 GP · 234 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingLeft wing · league-wide (of 281)

164Jordan Greenway-19

165Tommy Novak-19

166Warren Foegele-20

167Robby Fabbri-20

168Sammy Blais-20

169Collin Graf-20

170Nikita Nesterenko-22

offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year

We project it up

all5v5

We’re projecting goals 75% above last season, 8 to 14.

Second-half fade

PTS

all5v5

Points ran at a 10 pace in the second half after 27 in the first, per 82 games.

Above his 3-year rate

Hits/60

Hits/60 ran 79% above his 3-year rate last season (10.98 against 6.13).

Below his 3-year rate

iSH%

iSH% ran 55% below his 3-year rate last season (6.88 against 15.15).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Forward

Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit

Erik HaulaC,LW · Los Angeles Kings93% match
shared: Hits, PIM, Blocks
Easton CowanC,RW · Toronto Maple Leafs93% match
shared: PIM, Hits
Jake NeighboursLW,RW · St. Louis Blues92% match
shared: Hits, PIM, Blocks
Scott LaughtonLW · Los Angeles Kings90% match
shared: Hits, PIM, Blocks

Complementary Forward

Same position, opposite profile — strong where Robby Fabbri is weak or average, light where he’s strong

Jack HughesC,LW · New Jersey Devilscovers 3
fills: SOG, PPP, A
Jack EichelC · Vegas Golden Knightscovers 3
fills: SOG, A, PPP
Artemi PanarinLW · Los Angeles Kingscovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG
William NylanderRW · Toronto Maple Leafscovers 3
fills: PPP, SOG, A

Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)

This player

the profile below

vs Similar

similar players hug the shape

vs Complementary

complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)

Coaching

2026-27 · John Hynes (MIN)

Last year (STL, traded): John Hynes MIN · pre-trade → Jim Montgomery STL · acquired mid-season (small sample) — in-season change

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
TOI	12.43	11.81	14.54	-19%
5v5 TOI	11.28	11.19	11.87	-6%
PP TOI	0.38	0.26	1.90	-86%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 0 · 9 · 8 · 4

TOI*

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.

By season — year over year

TOI

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

TOI → 12.43: reverts toward the 3-yr 14.5
5v5 TOI → 11.28: holds last year's role
PP TOI → 0.38: same coach (John Hynes) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 0.5, Q4 0.5) over the full-year 0.3

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
SOG/60	7.41	7.41	5.49	+35%
G/60	0.69	0.51	0.83	-39%
iSH%	10.02	6.88	15.15	-55%
ixG/60	–	0.89	0.68	+31%
iCF/60	–	11.24	9.79	+15%
iSCF/60	–	8.43	6.36	+33%
iHDCF/60	–	4.60	3.14	+46%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 0 · 9 · 8 · 4

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

By season — year over year

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

SOG

all5v5

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindGoals projected UP: iSH% cratered to 6.9% vs 15.2% 3-yr while 5v5 ixG/60 0.89 (86th pct league-wide) held/rose — the chances say the finishing rebounds toward 10.0%, lifting the goal rate ~35%.

TailwindShot volume up 35% (5v5 SOG/60 7.41 vs 5.49) — volume is the repeatable half, so this raises the goal ceiling.

ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 0.68 (1st half) to 0.55 (2nd) even though shot volume held — a chance-quality dip, not a volume one.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
on-ice SH%	7.60	7.54	8.02	-6%
IPP	71.03	71.51	67.93	+5%
1A/60	0.58	0.77	0.29	+168%
2A/60	0.13	0.00	0.25	-100%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 0 · 9 · 8 · 4

1A/60

2A/60

By season — year over year

1A/60

2A/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

PTS

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 7.5%, IPP 71.5%).

TailwindShot-driving up (5v5 iCF/60 11.24 vs 9.79) — real creation underneath, so don't over-regress the helpers.

TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 4.60 vs 3.14) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PP TOI	0.38	0.26	1.90	-86%
PP iSH%	–	n/a	21.59
PP SOG/60	2.09	0.00	8.34	-100%
PP ixG/60	–	0.00	1.30	-100%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 0 · 9 · 8 · 4

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

By season — year over year

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PPP

PPG

PPA

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindPP role projected up: 0.3→0.4 PP TOI/gp (same coach (John Hynes) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 0.5, Q4 0.5) over the full-year 0.3) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PIMs/60	3.00	4.09	2.24	+83%
Hits/60	9.25	10.98	6.13	+79%
Blks/60	2.48	2.30	2.53	-9%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 0 · 9 · 8 · 4

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

By season — year over year

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PIM

all5v5

HITS

all5v5

BLK

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindHits surging late: Q4 14.58/60 and 2nd-half 14.58 vs a 10.98 season rate (6.13 3-yr) (87th pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 9.25/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.

TailwindBlocks surging late: Q4 2.78/60 and 2nd-half 2.78 vs a 2.30 season rate (2.53 3-yr) (41st pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 2.48/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.

TailwindStrong PIM rate (4.09/60 (90th pct league-wide)) — a banger-league asset.