Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2658 GP | H218 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3225 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.06 | 11.73 | 11.28 | 11.61 | 13.11 |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.16 |
| G | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| A | 14 | 21 | 8 | 27 | 11 |
| PTS | 20 | 24 | 11 | 30 | 20 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 65 | 54 | 50 | 47 | 83 |
| PIM | 25 | 25 | 16 | 26 | 32 |
| Hits | 104 | 110 | 118 | 106 | 110 |
| Blocks | 52 | 62 | 46 | 67 | 57 |
Sample: 58 GP · 542 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 8 pace in the second half after 27 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 ran 90% above his 3-year rate last season (0.88 against 0.46).
Blks/60 finished the year 38% below where it started (3.98 in the first half, 2.49 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
SOG/60 ran 28% below his 3-year rate last season (3.54 against 4.89).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.06 | 11.73 | 13.11 | -10% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.63 | 9.35 | 10.97 | -15% |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.16 | -72% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.43 | 3.54 | 4.89 | -28% |
| G/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.49 | -100% |
| iSH% | 5.77 | 0.00 | 9.95 | -100% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.56 | 0.60 | -6% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.07 | 9.65 | -16% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 4.53 | 5.69 | -20% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.21 | 3.31 | -3% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.08 | 8.24 | 7.59 | +9% |
| IPP | 85.35 | 100.00 | 55.62 | +80% |
| 1A/60 | 0.71 | 0.88 | 0.46 | +90% |
| 2A/60 | 0.27 | 0.55 | 0.15 | +269% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.16 | -72% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 6.70 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 2.71 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.31 | 1.55 | 1.97 | -21% |
| Hits/60 | 7.55 | 8.18 | 7.19 | +14% |
| Blks/60 | 3.05 | 3.65 | 2.99 | +22% |