Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H240 GP | H142 GP | Prev 362 GP · 1y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.48 | 16.62 | 15.69 | 15.56 | 11.39 |
| PP TOI | 1.69 | 1.73 | 1.82 | 1.65 | 1.03 |
| G | 24 | 22 | 18 | 27 | 13 |
| A | 9 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 11 |
| PTS | 33 | 31 | 23 | 39 | 24 |
| PPP | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| SOG | 159 | 173 | 180 | 166 | 85 |
| PIM | 25 | 18 | 12 | 23 | 26 |
| Hits | 260 | 247 | 220 | 273 | 225 |
| Blocks | 50 | 54 | 50 | 58 | 32 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,091 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI ran 69% above his 3-year rate last season (1.73 against 1.03).
Assists ran at a 5 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.
PP SOG/60 finished the year 62% above where it started (8.77 in the first half, 14.19 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 58% below his 3-year rate last season (0.16 against 0.38).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.48 | 16.62 | 11.39 | +46% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.29 | 13.31 | 10.27 | +30% |
| PP TOI | 1.69 | 1.73 | 1.03 | +69% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.04 | 7.04 | 4.90 | +44% |
| G/60 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.66 | +24% |
| iSH% | 12.34 | 11.65 | 13.47 | -14% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.82 | 0.60 | +37% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.98 | 13.00 | -0% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.08 | 6.50 | +24% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.86 | 1.60 | +79% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.40 | 6.87 | 9.38 | -27% |
| IPP | 60.32 | 59.90 | 61.62 | -3% |
| 1A/60 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.38 | -58% |
| 2A/60 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.19 | -16% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.69 | 1.73 | 1.03 | +69% |
| PP iSH% | 26.64 | 14.82 | 29.98 | -51% |
| PP SOG/60 | 13.04 | 11.40 | 9.44 | +21% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.64 | 1.75 | -6% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.06 | 0.88 | 1.32 | -33% |
| Hits/60 | 13.50 | 12.70 | 15.83 | -20% |
| Blks/60 | 2.35 | 2.47 | 2.26 | +9% |